Ontology type: schema:ScholarlyArticle
1995-08
AUTHORSDeborah Farmer, Ian R. Hill, Stephen J. Maund
ABSTRACTThe fate and effects of two pyrethroid insecticides (lambda-cyhalothrin and cypermethrin) were investigated in replicated 25 m3 pond mesocosms. Three pesticide treatments which simulated spray drift deposition were examined: 0.7 g a.i. ha-1 cypermethrin and 0.17 and 1.7 g a.i. ha-1 lambda-cyhalothrin. Based on the use rate and pesticidal activity of the chemicals, the cypermethrin and lower lambda-cyhalothrin rates were approximately equivalent. After applications, pyrethroid residues in the water column declined rapidly. Treatment-related effects were observed on some macroinvertebrate taxa, most notably the Asellidae and Gammaridae. Surfacedwelling insects also suffered initial knock-down, particularly in the 1.7 g a.i. ha-1 lambda-cyhalothrin treatment, but there was recovery after the spray period. No adverse effects occurred on algae, macrophytes or zooplankton, but there were occasional enhancements (e.g. algal biomass and abundances of copepod nauplii and Rotifera) which may have been indirect effects. An overall comparison of the treatments indicated that the higher lambda-cyhalothrin rate had the greatest effects, whilst the cypermethrin application had a somewhat greater impact than the lower lambda-cyhalothrin treatment rate (due to effects on peracarid crustaceans). The study indicated that should spray drift occur at the levels expected for either pyrethroid's normal use patterns, potential impacts on natural aquatic ecosystems would be minor and transient. More... »
PAGES219-244
http://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/bf00116342
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00116342
DIMENSIONShttps://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1032118091
PUBMEDhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24197745
JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.
TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT
[
{
"@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json",
"about": [
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/06",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Biological Sciences",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/0602",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Ecology",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
}
],
"author": [
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Ecology and Soil Science Section, Zeneca Agrochemicals, Jealott's Hill Research Station, RG12 6EY, Bracknell, Berkshire, UK",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.426114.4",
"name": [
"Ecology and Soil Science Section, Zeneca Agrochemicals, Jealott's Hill Research Station, RG12 6EY, Bracknell, Berkshire, UK"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Farmer",
"givenName": "Deborah",
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Ecology and Soil Science Section, Zeneca Agrochemicals, Jealott's Hill Research Station, RG12 6EY, Bracknell, Berkshire, UK",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.426114.4",
"name": [
"Ecology and Soil Science Section, Zeneca Agrochemicals, Jealott's Hill Research Station, RG12 6EY, Bracknell, Berkshire, UK"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Hill",
"givenName": "Ian R.",
"id": "sg:person.011377123623.92",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.011377123623.92"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Ecology and Soil Science Section, Zeneca Agrochemicals, Jealott's Hill Research Station, RG12 6EY, Bracknell, Berkshire, UK",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.426114.4",
"name": [
"Ecology and Soil Science Section, Zeneca Agrochemicals, Jealott's Hill Research Station, RG12 6EY, Bracknell, Berkshire, UK"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Maund",
"givenName": "Stephen J.",
"id": "sg:person.07574764234.28",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.07574764234.28"
],
"type": "Person"
}
],
"citation": [
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/bf00008238",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1021909182",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00008238"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
}
],
"datePublished": "1995-08",
"datePublishedReg": "1995-08-01",
"description": "The fate and effects of two pyrethroid insecticides (lambda-cyhalothrin and cypermethrin) were investigated in replicated 25 m3 pond mesocosms. Three pesticide treatments which simulated spray drift deposition were examined: 0.7 g a.i. ha-1 cypermethrin and 0.17 and 1.7 g a.i. ha-1 lambda-cyhalothrin. Based on the use rate and pesticidal activity of the chemicals, the cypermethrin and lower lambda-cyhalothrin rates were approximately equivalent. After applications, pyrethroid residues in the water column declined rapidly. Treatment-related effects were observed on some macroinvertebrate taxa, most notably the Asellidae and Gammaridae. Surfacedwelling insects also suffered initial knock-down, particularly in the 1.7 g a.i. ha-1 lambda-cyhalothrin treatment, but there was recovery after the spray period. No adverse effects occurred on algae, macrophytes or zooplankton, but there were occasional enhancements (e.g. algal biomass and abundances of copepod nauplii and Rotifera) which may have been indirect effects. An overall comparison of the treatments indicated that the higher lambda-cyhalothrin rate had the greatest effects, whilst the cypermethrin application had a somewhat greater impact than the lower lambda-cyhalothrin treatment rate (due to effects on peracarid crustaceans). The study indicated that should spray drift occur at the levels expected for either pyrethroid's normal use patterns, potential impacts on natural aquatic ecosystems would be minor and transient.",
"genre": "article",
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/bf00116342",
"isAccessibleForFree": false,
"isPartOf": [
{
"id": "sg:journal.1129600",
"issn": [
"0963-9292",
"1573-3017"
],
"name": "Ecotoxicology",
"publisher": "Springer Nature",
"type": "Periodical"
},
{
"issueNumber": "4",
"type": "PublicationIssue"
},
{
"type": "PublicationVolume",
"volumeNumber": "4"
}
],
"keywords": [
"natural aquatic ecosystems",
"spray drift deposition",
"macroinvertebrate taxa",
"aquatic ecosystems",
"pond mesocosms",
"cypermethrin application",
"drift deposition",
"use patterns",
"pyrethroid insecticides",
"pesticide treatments",
"water column",
"lambda-cyhalothrin treatment",
"potential impact",
"indirect effects",
"pyrethroid residues",
"fate",
"great impact",
"ecosystems",
"mesocosms",
"macrophytes",
"zooplankton",
"cypermethrin",
"Asellidae",
"Gammaridae",
"insecticides",
"greater effect",
"taxa",
"ponds",
"impact",
"algae",
"insects",
"chemicals",
"use rates",
"adverse effects",
"spray period",
"effect",
"patterns",
"rate",
"drift",
"deposition",
"overall comparison",
"residues",
"column",
"recovery",
"treatment-related effects",
"period",
"comparison",
"treatment rates",
"applications",
"levels",
"activity",
"study",
"treatment",
"enhancement",
"knock",
"occasional enhancement"
],
"name": "A comparison of the fate and effects of two pyrethroid insecticides (lambda-cyhalothrin and cypermethrin) in pond mesocosms",
"pagination": "219-244",
"productId": [
{
"name": "dimensions_id",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"pub.1032118091"
]
},
{
"name": "doi",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"10.1007/bf00116342"
]
},
{
"name": "pubmed_id",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"24197745"
]
}
],
"sameAs": [
"https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00116342",
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1032118091"
],
"sdDataset": "articles",
"sdDatePublished": "2022-08-04T16:52",
"sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/",
"sdPublisher": {
"name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project",
"type": "Organization"
},
"sdSource": "s3://com-springernature-scigraph/baseset/20220804/entities/gbq_results/article/article_292.jsonl",
"type": "ScholarlyArticle",
"url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00116342"
}
]
Download the RDF metadata as: json-ld nt turtle xml License info
JSON-LD is a popular format for linked data which is fully compatible with JSON.
curl -H 'Accept: application/ld+json' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/bf00116342'
N-Triples is a line-based linked data format ideal for batch operations.
curl -H 'Accept: application/n-triples' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/bf00116342'
Turtle is a human-readable linked data format.
curl -H 'Accept: text/turtle' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/bf00116342'
RDF/XML is a standard XML format for linked data.
curl -H 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/bf00116342'
This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.
134 TRIPLES
21 PREDICATES
83 URIs
74 LITERALS
7 BLANK NODES
Subject | Predicate | Object | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | sg:pub.10.1007/bf00116342 | schema:about | anzsrc-for:06 |
2 | ″ | ″ | anzsrc-for:0602 |
3 | ″ | schema:author | N97237d9381174fdd865f9b546a124e29 |
4 | ″ | schema:citation | sg:pub.10.1007/bf00008238 |
5 | ″ | schema:datePublished | 1995-08 |
6 | ″ | schema:datePublishedReg | 1995-08-01 |
7 | ″ | schema:description | The fate and effects of two pyrethroid insecticides (lambda-cyhalothrin and cypermethrin) were investigated in replicated 25 m3 pond mesocosms. Three pesticide treatments which simulated spray drift deposition were examined: 0.7 g a.i. ha-1 cypermethrin and 0.17 and 1.7 g a.i. ha-1 lambda-cyhalothrin. Based on the use rate and pesticidal activity of the chemicals, the cypermethrin and lower lambda-cyhalothrin rates were approximately equivalent. After applications, pyrethroid residues in the water column declined rapidly. Treatment-related effects were observed on some macroinvertebrate taxa, most notably the Asellidae and Gammaridae. Surfacedwelling insects also suffered initial knock-down, particularly in the 1.7 g a.i. ha-1 lambda-cyhalothrin treatment, but there was recovery after the spray period. No adverse effects occurred on algae, macrophytes or zooplankton, but there were occasional enhancements (e.g. algal biomass and abundances of copepod nauplii and Rotifera) which may have been indirect effects. An overall comparison of the treatments indicated that the higher lambda-cyhalothrin rate had the greatest effects, whilst the cypermethrin application had a somewhat greater impact than the lower lambda-cyhalothrin treatment rate (due to effects on peracarid crustaceans). The study indicated that should spray drift occur at the levels expected for either pyrethroid's normal use patterns, potential impacts on natural aquatic ecosystems would be minor and transient. |
8 | ″ | schema:genre | article |
9 | ″ | schema:isAccessibleForFree | false |
10 | ″ | schema:isPartOf | N7a3ebdac440b479d95978a6bed7b8cf7 |
11 | ″ | ″ | Nb97557400bd64d7689e5b07721d981b3 |
12 | ″ | ″ | sg:journal.1129600 |
13 | ″ | schema:keywords | Asellidae |
14 | ″ | ″ | Gammaridae |
15 | ″ | ″ | activity |
16 | ″ | ″ | adverse effects |
17 | ″ | ″ | algae |
18 | ″ | ″ | applications |
19 | ″ | ″ | aquatic ecosystems |
20 | ″ | ″ | chemicals |
21 | ″ | ″ | column |
22 | ″ | ″ | comparison |
23 | ″ | ″ | cypermethrin |
24 | ″ | ″ | cypermethrin application |
25 | ″ | ″ | deposition |
26 | ″ | ″ | drift |
27 | ″ | ″ | drift deposition |
28 | ″ | ″ | ecosystems |
29 | ″ | ″ | effect |
30 | ″ | ″ | enhancement |
31 | ″ | ″ | fate |
32 | ″ | ″ | great impact |
33 | ″ | ″ | greater effect |
34 | ″ | ″ | impact |
35 | ″ | ″ | indirect effects |
36 | ″ | ″ | insecticides |
37 | ″ | ″ | insects |
38 | ″ | ″ | knock |
39 | ″ | ″ | lambda-cyhalothrin treatment |
40 | ″ | ″ | levels |
41 | ″ | ″ | macroinvertebrate taxa |
42 | ″ | ″ | macrophytes |
43 | ″ | ″ | mesocosms |
44 | ″ | ″ | natural aquatic ecosystems |
45 | ″ | ″ | occasional enhancement |
46 | ″ | ″ | overall comparison |
47 | ″ | ″ | patterns |
48 | ″ | ″ | period |
49 | ″ | ″ | pesticide treatments |
50 | ″ | ″ | pond mesocosms |
51 | ″ | ″ | ponds |
52 | ″ | ″ | potential impact |
53 | ″ | ″ | pyrethroid insecticides |
54 | ″ | ″ | pyrethroid residues |
55 | ″ | ″ | rate |
56 | ″ | ″ | recovery |
57 | ″ | ″ | residues |
58 | ″ | ″ | spray drift deposition |
59 | ″ | ″ | spray period |
60 | ″ | ″ | study |
61 | ″ | ″ | taxa |
62 | ″ | ″ | treatment |
63 | ″ | ″ | treatment rates |
64 | ″ | ″ | treatment-related effects |
65 | ″ | ″ | use patterns |
66 | ″ | ″ | use rates |
67 | ″ | ″ | water column |
68 | ″ | ″ | zooplankton |
69 | ″ | schema:name | A comparison of the fate and effects of two pyrethroid insecticides (lambda-cyhalothrin and cypermethrin) in pond mesocosms |
70 | ″ | schema:pagination | 219-244 |
71 | ″ | schema:productId | N5be1830848e54ae2a6cfb96b39b1ecd9 |
72 | ″ | ″ | N6b247c9451e64bf19b07c1425daf3567 |
73 | ″ | ″ | Nf877a0fdb7904df8857edd5de2f5d20c |
74 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1032118091 |
75 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00116342 |
76 | ″ | schema:sdDatePublished | 2022-08-04T16:52 |
77 | ″ | schema:sdLicense | https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/ |
78 | ″ | schema:sdPublisher | N9338e47c9e3d4e0c84e6a7778607d3ca |
79 | ″ | schema:url | https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00116342 |
80 | ″ | sgo:license | sg:explorer/license/ |
81 | ″ | sgo:sdDataset | articles |
82 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:ScholarlyArticle |
83 | N4ea8ad754bee442db41f3abea74e17a6 | rdf:first | sg:person.07574764234.28 |
84 | ″ | rdf:rest | rdf:nil |
85 | N5be1830848e54ae2a6cfb96b39b1ecd9 | schema:name | doi |
86 | ″ | schema:value | 10.1007/bf00116342 |
87 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PropertyValue |
88 | N69d102ccadfc45ff8a9fa594435cb69c | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:grid.426114.4 |
89 | ″ | schema:familyName | Farmer |
90 | ″ | schema:givenName | Deborah |
91 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
92 | N6b247c9451e64bf19b07c1425daf3567 | schema:name | dimensions_id |
93 | ″ | schema:value | pub.1032118091 |
94 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PropertyValue |
95 | N7a3ebdac440b479d95978a6bed7b8cf7 | schema:issueNumber | 4 |
96 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PublicationIssue |
97 | N9338e47c9e3d4e0c84e6a7778607d3ca | schema:name | Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project |
98 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |
99 | N97237d9381174fdd865f9b546a124e29 | rdf:first | N69d102ccadfc45ff8a9fa594435cb69c |
100 | ″ | rdf:rest | Nb2716cc9c0bb476bb7e753eb69a61599 |
101 | Nb2716cc9c0bb476bb7e753eb69a61599 | rdf:first | sg:person.011377123623.92 |
102 | ″ | rdf:rest | N4ea8ad754bee442db41f3abea74e17a6 |
103 | Nb97557400bd64d7689e5b07721d981b3 | schema:volumeNumber | 4 |
104 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PublicationVolume |
105 | Nf877a0fdb7904df8857edd5de2f5d20c | schema:name | pubmed_id |
106 | ″ | schema:value | 24197745 |
107 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PropertyValue |
108 | anzsrc-for:06 | schema:inDefinedTermSet | anzsrc-for: |
109 | ″ | schema:name | Biological Sciences |
110 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
111 | anzsrc-for:0602 | schema:inDefinedTermSet | anzsrc-for: |
112 | ″ | schema:name | Ecology |
113 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
114 | sg:journal.1129600 | schema:issn | 0963-9292 |
115 | ″ | ″ | 1573-3017 |
116 | ″ | schema:name | Ecotoxicology |
117 | ″ | schema:publisher | Springer Nature |
118 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Periodical |
119 | sg:person.011377123623.92 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:grid.426114.4 |
120 | ″ | schema:familyName | Hill |
121 | ″ | schema:givenName | Ian R. |
122 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.011377123623.92 |
123 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
124 | sg:person.07574764234.28 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:grid.426114.4 |
125 | ″ | schema:familyName | Maund |
126 | ″ | schema:givenName | Stephen J. |
127 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.07574764234.28 |
128 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
129 | sg:pub.10.1007/bf00008238 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1021909182 |
130 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00008238 |
131 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
132 | grid-institutes:grid.426114.4 | schema:alternateName | Ecology and Soil Science Section, Zeneca Agrochemicals, Jealott's Hill Research Station, RG12 6EY, Bracknell, Berkshire, UK |
133 | ″ | schema:name | Ecology and Soil Science Section, Zeneca Agrochemicals, Jealott's Hill Research Station, RG12 6EY, Bracknell, Berkshire, UK |
134 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |