JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.

TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT

[
  {
    "@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json", 
    "about": [
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/11", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "name": "Medical and Health Sciences", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/1117", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "name": "Public Health and Health Services", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }
    ], 
    "author": [
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK", 
          "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.11835.3e", 
          "name": [
            "School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Booth", 
        "givenName": "Andrew", 
        "id": "sg:person.01066215154.63", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01066215154.63"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }
    ], 
    "datePublished": "2017-05-18", 
    "datePublishedReg": "2017-05-18", 
    "description": "Qualitative evidence synthesis, also known as qualitative systematic review, offers a vehicle for presenting patients\u2019 attitudes, beliefs and feelings as originally captured by individual qualitative research studies. By aggregating or integrating views from multiple studies, rather than a single study, the science of systematic reviews takes steps to protect against allowing findings from an isolated study to overly influence our understanding or even to lead us to omit important perspectives. This chapter examines the wide range of uses to which qualitative evidence synthesis can be applied within HTA (Ring et al., Int J Technol Assess Health Care 27:384\u2013390, 2011a; http://www.nhshealthquality.org/nhsqis/8837.html. Accessed 8 Apr 2016, 2011b) and introduces methods to identify, synthesise and analyse patient narratives from the research literature. The chapter concludes by briefly reviewing methods by which qualitative data might be integrated with quantitative data from an effectiveness review.", 
    "editor": [
      {
        "familyName": "Facey", 
        "givenName": "Karen M.", 
        "type": "Person"
      }, 
      {
        "familyName": "Ploug Hansen", 
        "givenName": "Helle", 
        "type": "Person"
      }, 
      {
        "familyName": "Single", 
        "givenName": "Ann N.V.", 
        "type": "Person"
      }
    ], 
    "genre": "chapter", 
    "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/978-981-10-4068-9_15", 
    "isAccessibleForFree": true, 
    "isPartOf": {
      "isbn": [
        "978-981-10-4067-2", 
        "978-981-10-4068-9"
      ], 
      "name": "Patient Involvement in Health Technology Assessment", 
      "type": "Book"
    }, 
    "keywords": [
      "qualitative evidence synthesis", 
      "evidence synthesis", 
      "systematic review", 
      "qualitative systematic review", 
      "effectiveness review", 
      "patient narratives", 
      "multiple studies", 
      "single study", 
      "qualitative research study", 
      "review", 
      "qualitative data", 
      "patients", 
      "study", 
      "research literature", 
      "research studies", 
      "important perspective", 
      "quantitative data", 
      "HTA", 
      "findings", 
      "chapter", 
      "narratives", 
      "data", 
      "attitudes", 
      "perspective", 
      "beliefs", 
      "feelings", 
      "literature", 
      "science", 
      "uses", 
      "view", 
      "synthesis", 
      "method", 
      "understanding", 
      "briefly", 
      "wide range", 
      "range", 
      "step", 
      "vehicles"
    ], 
    "name": "Qualitative Evidence Synthesis", 
    "pagination": "187-199", 
    "productId": [
      {
        "name": "dimensions_id", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "pub.1085429935"
        ]
      }, 
      {
        "name": "doi", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "10.1007/978-981-10-4068-9_15"
        ]
      }
    ], 
    "publisher": {
      "name": "Springer Nature", 
      "type": "Organisation"
    }, 
    "sameAs": [
      "https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4068-9_15", 
      "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1085429935"
    ], 
    "sdDataset": "chapters", 
    "sdDatePublished": "2022-08-04T17:14", 
    "sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/", 
    "sdPublisher": {
      "name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project", 
      "type": "Organization"
    }, 
    "sdSource": "s3://com-springernature-scigraph/baseset/20220804/entities/gbq_results/chapter/chapter_13.jsonl", 
    "type": "Chapter", 
    "url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4068-9_15"
  }
]

Download the RDF metadata as:  json-ld nt turtle xml License info

This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.

107 TRIPLES      22 PREDICATES      61 URIs      54 LITERALS      7 BLANK NODES