A Refutation of Penrose’s Gödelian Case View Full Text


Ontology type: schema:Chapter     


Chapter Info

DATE

2003

AUTHORS

Selmer Bringsjord , Michael Zenzen

ABSTRACT

Those who go in for attacking AI can be indefatigable. John Searle tirelessly targets at least one brand of AI (“Strong” AI) with variations on his Chinese Room. (Searle fired the first shot in (Searle 1980). Two decades later, CR is alive and well, as the arrival of a new book (Bishop & Preston 2002) reveals.). Bringsjord has at last count published 16 formal arguments against “Strong” AI. (For a sampling, recall Table 1.) And Roger Penrose appears to have the same endless energy when it comes to producing Gödelian attacks on AI: Having, as it is generally agreed, failed to improve on Lucas’ at-best-controversial primogenitor (Lucas 1964) with the argument as formulated in his The Emperor’s New Mind (ENM) (Penrose 1989),1 Penrose returned, armed with a new Gödelian case, expressed in his Shadows of the Mind (SOTM) (Penrose 1994). This case, unlike its predecessor, does more than recapitulate Lucas’ argument, but it nonetheless fails, as we shall see. The great irony is that this case is based on Penrose’s near-deification of logico-mathematical reasoning, but such reasoning, as we show herein, can be used to refute Penrose’s case. More... »

PAGES

49-84

Book

TITLE

Superminds

ISBN

978-1-4020-1095-8
978-94-010-0283-7

Author Affiliations

Identifiers

URI

http://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/978-94-010-0283-7_2

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0283-7_2

DIMENSIONS

https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1026514981


Indexing Status Check whether this publication has been indexed by Scopus and Web Of Science using the SN Indexing Status Tool
Incoming Citations Browse incoming citations for this publication using opencitations.net

JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.

TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT

[
  {
    "@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json", 
    "about": [
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/2103", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "name": "Historical Studies", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/21", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "name": "History and Archaeology", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }
    ], 
    "author": [
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute", 
          "id": "https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.33647.35", 
          "name": [
            "Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI), Troy, USA"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Bringsjord", 
        "givenName": "Selmer", 
        "type": "Person"
      }, 
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute", 
          "id": "https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.33647.35", 
          "name": [
            "Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI), Troy, USA"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Zenzen", 
        "givenName": "Michael", 
        "type": "Person"
      }
    ], 
    "datePublished": "2003", 
    "datePublishedReg": "2003-01-01", 
    "description": "Those who go in for attacking AI can be indefatigable. John Searle tirelessly targets at least one brand of AI (\u201cStrong\u201d AI) with variations on his Chinese Room. (Searle fired the first shot in (Searle 1980). Two decades later, CR is alive and well, as the arrival of a new book (Bishop & Preston 2002) reveals.). Bringsjord has at last count published 16 formal arguments against \u201cStrong\u201d AI. (For a sampling, recall Table 1.) And Roger Penrose appears to have the same endless energy when it comes to producing G\u00f6delian attacks on AI: Having, as it is generally agreed, failed to improve on Lucas\u2019 at-best-controversial primogenitor (Lucas 1964) with the argument as formulated in his The Emperor\u2019s New Mind (ENM) (Penrose 1989),1 Penrose returned, armed with a new G\u00f6delian case, expressed in his Shadows of the Mind (SOTM) (Penrose 1994). This case, unlike its predecessor, does more than recapitulate Lucas\u2019 argument, but it nonetheless fails, as we shall see. The great irony is that this case is based on Penrose\u2019s near-deification of logico-mathematical reasoning, but such reasoning, as we show herein, can be used to refute Penrose\u2019s case.", 
    "genre": "chapter", 
    "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/978-94-010-0283-7_2", 
    "inLanguage": [
      "en"
    ], 
    "isAccessibleForFree": false, 
    "isPartOf": {
      "isbn": [
        "978-1-4020-1095-8", 
        "978-94-010-0283-7"
      ], 
      "name": "Superminds", 
      "type": "Book"
    }, 
    "name": "A Refutation of Penrose\u2019s G\u00f6delian Case", 
    "pagination": "49-84", 
    "productId": [
      {
        "name": "doi", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "10.1007/978-94-010-0283-7_2"
        ]
      }, 
      {
        "name": "readcube_id", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "7e519c7a559d095c8435c08cdf17e34d8aa1c507b69f6722b67787c06a68615a"
        ]
      }, 
      {
        "name": "dimensions_id", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "pub.1026514981"
        ]
      }
    ], 
    "publisher": {
      "location": "Dordrecht", 
      "name": "Springer Netherlands", 
      "type": "Organisation"
    }, 
    "sameAs": [
      "https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0283-7_2", 
      "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1026514981"
    ], 
    "sdDataset": "chapters", 
    "sdDatePublished": "2019-04-15T18:56", 
    "sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/", 
    "sdPublisher": {
      "name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project", 
      "type": "Organization"
    }, 
    "sdSource": "s3://com-uberresearch-data-dimensions-target-20181106-alternative/cleanup/v134/2549eaecd7973599484d7c17b260dba0a4ecb94b/merge/v9/a6c9fde33151104705d4d7ff012ea9563521a3ce/jats-lookup/v90/0000000001_0000000264/records_8684_00000045.jsonl", 
    "type": "Chapter", 
    "url": "http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-94-010-0283-7_2"
  }
]
 

Download the RDF metadata as:  json-ld nt turtle xml License info

HOW TO GET THIS DATA PROGRAMMATICALLY:

JSON-LD is a popular format for linked data which is fully compatible with JSON.

curl -H 'Accept: application/ld+json' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/978-94-010-0283-7_2'

N-Triples is a line-based linked data format ideal for batch operations.

curl -H 'Accept: application/n-triples' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/978-94-010-0283-7_2'

Turtle is a human-readable linked data format.

curl -H 'Accept: text/turtle' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/978-94-010-0283-7_2'

RDF/XML is a standard XML format for linked data.

curl -H 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/978-94-010-0283-7_2'


 

This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.

64 TRIPLES      21 PREDICATES      26 URIs      19 LITERALS      7 BLANK NODES

Subject Predicate Object
1 sg:pub.10.1007/978-94-010-0283-7_2 schema:about anzsrc-for:21
2 anzsrc-for:2103
3 schema:author N8603646b272d48ff82d753eb98e006d0
4 schema:datePublished 2003
5 schema:datePublishedReg 2003-01-01
6 schema:description Those who go in for attacking AI can be indefatigable. John Searle tirelessly targets at least one brand of AI (“Strong” AI) with variations on his Chinese Room. (Searle fired the first shot in (Searle 1980). Two decades later, CR is alive and well, as the arrival of a new book (Bishop & Preston 2002) reveals.). Bringsjord has at last count published 16 formal arguments against “Strong” AI. (For a sampling, recall Table 1.) And Roger Penrose appears to have the same endless energy when it comes to producing Gödelian attacks on AI: Having, as it is generally agreed, failed to improve on Lucas’ at-best-controversial primogenitor (Lucas 1964) with the argument as formulated in his The Emperor’s New Mind (ENM) (Penrose 1989),1 Penrose returned, armed with a new Gödelian case, expressed in his Shadows of the Mind (SOTM) (Penrose 1994). This case, unlike its predecessor, does more than recapitulate Lucas’ argument, but it nonetheless fails, as we shall see. The great irony is that this case is based on Penrose’s near-deification of logico-mathematical reasoning, but such reasoning, as we show herein, can be used to refute Penrose’s case.
7 schema:genre chapter
8 schema:inLanguage en
9 schema:isAccessibleForFree false
10 schema:isPartOf N4051544db80b432bbd74bdd0d26863bf
11 schema:name A Refutation of Penrose’s Gödelian Case
12 schema:pagination 49-84
13 schema:productId N2c2a435a3f7044b6a666a03223ac960e
14 N35164b0710f64a37ba632f928ddefecc
15 Ne20ec49a2971420d83689225af048edf
16 schema:publisher Ndde89095416247a38236e20a731dd260
17 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1026514981
18 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0283-7_2
19 schema:sdDatePublished 2019-04-15T18:56
20 schema:sdLicense https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/
21 schema:sdPublisher Ndfb8cf812c554b6286864eb08575aa40
22 schema:url http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-94-010-0283-7_2
23 sgo:license sg:explorer/license/
24 sgo:sdDataset chapters
25 rdf:type schema:Chapter
26 N07de99d26cbe40ebb2e6aa9cd8688631 schema:affiliation https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.33647.35
27 schema:familyName Bringsjord
28 schema:givenName Selmer
29 rdf:type schema:Person
30 N2c2a435a3f7044b6a666a03223ac960e schema:name readcube_id
31 schema:value 7e519c7a559d095c8435c08cdf17e34d8aa1c507b69f6722b67787c06a68615a
32 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
33 N35164b0710f64a37ba632f928ddefecc schema:name dimensions_id
34 schema:value pub.1026514981
35 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
36 N39599f0f7ae341eb84ccde0138564b2c schema:affiliation https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.33647.35
37 schema:familyName Zenzen
38 schema:givenName Michael
39 rdf:type schema:Person
40 N4051544db80b432bbd74bdd0d26863bf schema:isbn 978-1-4020-1095-8
41 978-94-010-0283-7
42 schema:name Superminds
43 rdf:type schema:Book
44 N8603646b272d48ff82d753eb98e006d0 rdf:first N07de99d26cbe40ebb2e6aa9cd8688631
45 rdf:rest N90f7015da969486bb0340b7657ca1f4c
46 N90f7015da969486bb0340b7657ca1f4c rdf:first N39599f0f7ae341eb84ccde0138564b2c
47 rdf:rest rdf:nil
48 Ndde89095416247a38236e20a731dd260 schema:location Dordrecht
49 schema:name Springer Netherlands
50 rdf:type schema:Organisation
51 Ndfb8cf812c554b6286864eb08575aa40 schema:name Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project
52 rdf:type schema:Organization
53 Ne20ec49a2971420d83689225af048edf schema:name doi
54 schema:value 10.1007/978-94-010-0283-7_2
55 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
56 anzsrc-for:21 schema:inDefinedTermSet anzsrc-for:
57 schema:name History and Archaeology
58 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
59 anzsrc-for:2103 schema:inDefinedTermSet anzsrc-for:
60 schema:name Historical Studies
61 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
62 https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.33647.35 schema:alternateName Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
63 schema:name Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI), Troy, USA
64 rdf:type schema:Organization
 




Preview window. Press ESC to close (or click here)


...