1987
AUTHORSAnders Heijl , Georg Lindgren , Jonny Olsson
ABSTRACTThe distribution of results of perimetric reliability tests, false positive and false negative answers, fixation losses and short-term fluctuation, was studied in a material of 84 healthy normal subjects, randomly selected from the population, and in 45 patients with glaucoma. All subjects were tested with the 30–2 programme of the Humphrey Field Analyzer. We further investigated the influence of perimetric reliability on the measured visual field, as expressed by the visual field indices Mean Deviation and Pattern Standard Deviation. Sample multiple correlation coefficients were calculated for a number of combinations of reliability parameters and visual field indices.False negative answer were more common and short-term fluctuation higher in glaucomatous than in normal subjects. False positive answer and fixation losses did not differ between groups. Among glaucoma patients false negative answers were significantly more common than false positive answers. No such difference was found in the group of normals. The results showed no age-dependence. A large part of inter-individual field variability, particularly among normals, could be explained by perimetric reliability. false negative answers and short-term fluctuation had the largest predictive value.Normal inter-individual variation decreased considerably when stricter criteria for minimun results at reliability testing were applied. Naturally the number of fields meeting these criteria decreased at the same time. therefore, when establishing limits for normality, a compromise must be made resulting in reasonably narrow prediction limits without excluding a large percentage of normal and pathological fields from analysis. More... »
PAGES593-600
Seventh International Visual Field Symposium, Amsterdam, September 1986
ISBN
978-94-010-7993-8
978-94-009-3325-5
http://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/978-94-009-3325-5_75
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3325-5_75
DIMENSIONShttps://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1023157561
JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.
TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT
[
{
"@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json",
"about": [
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/17",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Psychology and Cognitive Sciences",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/1701",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Psychology",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
}
],
"author": [
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Dept of Ophthalmology, University of Lund, Malm\u00f6 General Hospital, S-21401, Malm\u00f6, Sweden",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.411843.b",
"name": [
"Malm\u00f6 and Lund, Sweden",
"Dept of Ophthalmology, University of Lund, Malm\u00f6 General Hospital, S-21401, Malm\u00f6, Sweden"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Heijl",
"givenName": "Anders",
"id": "sg:person.01042356506.18",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01042356506.18"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Dept of Mathematical Statistics, University of Lund, PO Box 118, S-22100, Lund, Sweden",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.4514.4",
"name": [
"Malm\u00f6 and Lund, Sweden",
"Dept of Mathematical Statistics, University of Lund, PO Box 118, S-22100, Lund, Sweden"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Lindgren",
"givenName": "Georg",
"id": "sg:person.012274436413.00",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.012274436413.00"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Dept of Mathematical Statistics, University of Lund, PO Box 118, S-22100, Lund, Sweden",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.4514.4",
"name": [
"Malm\u00f6 and Lund, Sweden",
"Dept of Mathematical Statistics, University of Lund, PO Box 118, S-22100, Lund, Sweden"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Olsson",
"givenName": "Jonny",
"id": "sg:person.01237061656.70",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01237061656.70"
],
"type": "Person"
}
],
"datePublished": "1987",
"datePublishedReg": "1987-01-01",
"description": "The distribution of results of perimetric reliability tests, false positive and false negative answers, fixation losses and short-term fluctuation, was studied in a material of 84 healthy normal subjects, randomly selected from the population, and in 45 patients with glaucoma. All subjects were tested with the 30\u20132 programme of the Humphrey Field Analyzer. We further investigated the influence of perimetric reliability on the measured visual field, as expressed by the visual field indices Mean Deviation and Pattern Standard Deviation. Sample multiple correlation coefficients were calculated for a number of combinations of reliability parameters and visual field indices.False negative answer were more common and short-term fluctuation higher in glaucomatous than in normal subjects. False positive answer and fixation losses did not differ between groups. Among glaucoma patients false negative answers were significantly more common than false positive answers. No such difference was found in the group of normals. The results showed no age-dependence. A large part of inter-individual field variability, particularly among normals, could be explained by perimetric reliability. false negative answers and short-term fluctuation had the largest predictive value.Normal inter-individual variation decreased considerably when stricter criteria for minimun results at reliability testing were applied. Naturally the number of fields meeting these criteria decreased at the same time. therefore, when establishing limits for normality, a compromise must be made resulting in reasonably narrow prediction limits without excluding a large percentage of normal and pathological fields from analysis.",
"editor": [
{
"familyName": "Greve",
"givenName": "E. L.",
"type": "Person"
},
{
"familyName": "Heijl",
"givenName": "A.",
"type": "Person"
}
],
"genre": "chapter",
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/978-94-009-3325-5_75",
"inLanguage": "en",
"isAccessibleForFree": false,
"isPartOf": {
"isbn": [
"978-94-010-7993-8",
"978-94-009-3325-5"
],
"name": "Seventh International Visual Field Symposium, Amsterdam, September 1986",
"type": "Book"
},
"keywords": [
"fixation loss",
"normal subjects",
"pattern standard deviation",
"visual field indices",
"Humphrey Field Analyzer",
"healthy normal subjects",
"false-positive answers",
"normal inter-individual variation",
"measured visual field",
"group of normals",
"largest predictive value",
"predictive value",
"computerized perimetry",
"field indices",
"inter-individual variation",
"false negative answers",
"visual field",
"strict criteria",
"Field Analyzer",
"pathological fields",
"subjects",
"mean deviation",
"large percentage",
"normals",
"patients",
"glaucoma",
"group",
"perimetry",
"distribution of results",
"correlation coefficient",
"such differences",
"criteria",
"reliability testing",
"loss",
"prediction limits",
"population",
"percentage",
"index",
"differences",
"short-term fluctuations",
"testing",
"number",
"results",
"test",
"standard deviation",
"multiple correlation coefficient",
"program",
"combination",
"large part",
"positive answer",
"compromise",
"time",
"variability",
"analysis",
"reliability",
"answers",
"part",
"same time",
"values",
"normality",
"parameters",
"deviation",
"number of combinations",
"influence",
"analyzer",
"sample multiple correlation coefficient",
"materials",
"variation",
"distribution",
"limit",
"reliability test",
"number of fields",
"fluctuations",
"field",
"negative answer",
"coefficient",
"reliability parameters",
"field variability"
],
"name": "Reliability parameters in computerized perimetry",
"pagination": "593-600",
"productId": [
{
"name": "dimensions_id",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"pub.1023157561"
]
},
{
"name": "doi",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"10.1007/978-94-009-3325-5_75"
]
}
],
"publisher": {
"name": "Springer Nature",
"type": "Organisation"
},
"sameAs": [
"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3325-5_75",
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1023157561"
],
"sdDataset": "chapters",
"sdDatePublished": "2022-05-20T07:46",
"sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/",
"sdPublisher": {
"name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project",
"type": "Organization"
},
"sdSource": "s3://com-springernature-scigraph/baseset/20220519/entities/gbq_results/chapter/chapter_325.jsonl",
"type": "Chapter",
"url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3325-5_75"
}
]
Download the RDF metadata as: json-ld nt turtle xml License info
JSON-LD is a popular format for linked data which is fully compatible with JSON.
curl -H 'Accept: application/ld+json' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/978-94-009-3325-5_75'
N-Triples is a line-based linked data format ideal for batch operations.
curl -H 'Accept: application/n-triples' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/978-94-009-3325-5_75'
Turtle is a human-readable linked data format.
curl -H 'Accept: text/turtle' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/978-94-009-3325-5_75'
RDF/XML is a standard XML format for linked data.
curl -H 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/978-94-009-3325-5_75'
This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.
162 TRIPLES
23 PREDICATES
104 URIs
97 LITERALS
7 BLANK NODES
Subject | Predicate | Object | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | sg:pub.10.1007/978-94-009-3325-5_75 | schema:about | anzsrc-for:17 |
2 | ″ | ″ | anzsrc-for:1701 |
3 | ″ | schema:author | N4c7b4d6d585948bcb80e250962b1a8a8 |
4 | ″ | schema:datePublished | 1987 |
5 | ″ | schema:datePublishedReg | 1987-01-01 |
6 | ″ | schema:description | The distribution of results of perimetric reliability tests, false positive and false negative answers, fixation losses and short-term fluctuation, was studied in a material of 84 healthy normal subjects, randomly selected from the population, and in 45 patients with glaucoma. All subjects were tested with the 30–2 programme of the Humphrey Field Analyzer. We further investigated the influence of perimetric reliability on the measured visual field, as expressed by the visual field indices Mean Deviation and Pattern Standard Deviation. Sample multiple correlation coefficients were calculated for a number of combinations of reliability parameters and visual field indices.False negative answer were more common and short-term fluctuation higher in glaucomatous than in normal subjects. False positive answer and fixation losses did not differ between groups. Among glaucoma patients false negative answers were significantly more common than false positive answers. No such difference was found in the group of normals. The results showed no age-dependence. A large part of inter-individual field variability, particularly among normals, could be explained by perimetric reliability. false negative answers and short-term fluctuation had the largest predictive value.Normal inter-individual variation decreased considerably when stricter criteria for minimun results at reliability testing were applied. Naturally the number of fields meeting these criteria decreased at the same time. therefore, when establishing limits for normality, a compromise must be made resulting in reasonably narrow prediction limits without excluding a large percentage of normal and pathological fields from analysis. |
7 | ″ | schema:editor | N7614615a944b4f838c6e28e165f44bd3 |
8 | ″ | schema:genre | chapter |
9 | ″ | schema:inLanguage | en |
10 | ″ | schema:isAccessibleForFree | false |
11 | ″ | schema:isPartOf | Nb0e7cbc918d94ed5b17a8de6db3b2d64 |
12 | ″ | schema:keywords | Field Analyzer |
13 | ″ | ″ | Humphrey Field Analyzer |
14 | ″ | ″ | analysis |
15 | ″ | ″ | analyzer |
16 | ″ | ″ | answers |
17 | ″ | ″ | coefficient |
18 | ″ | ″ | combination |
19 | ″ | ″ | compromise |
20 | ″ | ″ | computerized perimetry |
21 | ″ | ″ | correlation coefficient |
22 | ″ | ″ | criteria |
23 | ″ | ″ | deviation |
24 | ″ | ″ | differences |
25 | ″ | ″ | distribution |
26 | ″ | ″ | distribution of results |
27 | ″ | ″ | false negative answers |
28 | ″ | ″ | false-positive answers |
29 | ″ | ″ | field |
30 | ″ | ″ | field indices |
31 | ″ | ″ | field variability |
32 | ″ | ″ | fixation loss |
33 | ″ | ″ | fluctuations |
34 | ″ | ″ | glaucoma |
35 | ″ | ″ | group |
36 | ″ | ″ | group of normals |
37 | ″ | ″ | healthy normal subjects |
38 | ″ | ″ | index |
39 | ″ | ″ | influence |
40 | ″ | ″ | inter-individual variation |
41 | ″ | ″ | large part |
42 | ″ | ″ | large percentage |
43 | ″ | ″ | largest predictive value |
44 | ″ | ″ | limit |
45 | ″ | ″ | loss |
46 | ″ | ″ | materials |
47 | ″ | ″ | mean deviation |
48 | ″ | ″ | measured visual field |
49 | ″ | ″ | multiple correlation coefficient |
50 | ″ | ″ | negative answer |
51 | ″ | ″ | normal inter-individual variation |
52 | ″ | ″ | normal subjects |
53 | ″ | ″ | normality |
54 | ″ | ″ | normals |
55 | ″ | ″ | number |
56 | ″ | ″ | number of combinations |
57 | ″ | ″ | number of fields |
58 | ″ | ″ | parameters |
59 | ″ | ″ | part |
60 | ″ | ″ | pathological fields |
61 | ″ | ″ | patients |
62 | ″ | ″ | pattern standard deviation |
63 | ″ | ″ | percentage |
64 | ″ | ″ | perimetry |
65 | ″ | ″ | population |
66 | ″ | ″ | positive answer |
67 | ″ | ″ | prediction limits |
68 | ″ | ″ | predictive value |
69 | ″ | ″ | program |
70 | ″ | ″ | reliability |
71 | ″ | ″ | reliability parameters |
72 | ″ | ″ | reliability test |
73 | ″ | ″ | reliability testing |
74 | ″ | ″ | results |
75 | ″ | ″ | same time |
76 | ″ | ″ | sample multiple correlation coefficient |
77 | ″ | ″ | short-term fluctuations |
78 | ″ | ″ | standard deviation |
79 | ″ | ″ | strict criteria |
80 | ″ | ″ | subjects |
81 | ″ | ″ | such differences |
82 | ″ | ″ | test |
83 | ″ | ″ | testing |
84 | ″ | ″ | time |
85 | ″ | ″ | values |
86 | ″ | ″ | variability |
87 | ″ | ″ | variation |
88 | ″ | ″ | visual field |
89 | ″ | ″ | visual field indices |
90 | ″ | schema:name | Reliability parameters in computerized perimetry |
91 | ″ | schema:pagination | 593-600 |
92 | ″ | schema:productId | N2a52249a97114b48b6ceb24b4d4bebc2 |
93 | ″ | ″ | N4ca346e1121a4b89b967ef8c71557005 |
94 | ″ | schema:publisher | N5194de1c0f3a4c7494e1682dd11ce8fd |
95 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1023157561 |
96 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3325-5_75 |
97 | ″ | schema:sdDatePublished | 2022-05-20T07:46 |
98 | ″ | schema:sdLicense | https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/ |
99 | ″ | schema:sdPublisher | N275ee7777c5e44919135460ede08f865 |
100 | ″ | schema:url | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3325-5_75 |
101 | ″ | sgo:license | sg:explorer/license/ |
102 | ″ | sgo:sdDataset | chapters |
103 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Chapter |
104 | N09dd905bda464628a1e3c05f913b01ec | rdf:first | sg:person.01237061656.70 |
105 | ″ | rdf:rest | rdf:nil |
106 | N17bd7a40c33941d2b56fc5fdc58422de | rdf:first | Nd99bbd4c0139492db774a253ca4efda6 |
107 | ″ | rdf:rest | rdf:nil |
108 | N275ee7777c5e44919135460ede08f865 | schema:name | Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project |
109 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |
110 | N2a52249a97114b48b6ceb24b4d4bebc2 | schema:name | doi |
111 | ″ | schema:value | 10.1007/978-94-009-3325-5_75 |
112 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PropertyValue |
113 | N4c7b4d6d585948bcb80e250962b1a8a8 | rdf:first | sg:person.01042356506.18 |
114 | ″ | rdf:rest | N8ca6c69dd535424aa089c1ad5b5a0dcb |
115 | N4ca346e1121a4b89b967ef8c71557005 | schema:name | dimensions_id |
116 | ″ | schema:value | pub.1023157561 |
117 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PropertyValue |
118 | N5194de1c0f3a4c7494e1682dd11ce8fd | schema:name | Springer Nature |
119 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organisation |
120 | N5305479bee594bb7b74cf3e3b2ce66ed | schema:familyName | Greve |
121 | ″ | schema:givenName | E. L. |
122 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
123 | N7614615a944b4f838c6e28e165f44bd3 | rdf:first | N5305479bee594bb7b74cf3e3b2ce66ed |
124 | ″ | rdf:rest | N17bd7a40c33941d2b56fc5fdc58422de |
125 | N8ca6c69dd535424aa089c1ad5b5a0dcb | rdf:first | sg:person.012274436413.00 |
126 | ″ | rdf:rest | N09dd905bda464628a1e3c05f913b01ec |
127 | Nb0e7cbc918d94ed5b17a8de6db3b2d64 | schema:isbn | 978-94-009-3325-5 |
128 | ″ | ″ | 978-94-010-7993-8 |
129 | ″ | schema:name | Seventh International Visual Field Symposium, Amsterdam, September 1986 |
130 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Book |
131 | Nd99bbd4c0139492db774a253ca4efda6 | schema:familyName | Heijl |
132 | ″ | schema:givenName | A. |
133 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
134 | anzsrc-for:17 | schema:inDefinedTermSet | anzsrc-for: |
135 | ″ | schema:name | Psychology and Cognitive Sciences |
136 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
137 | anzsrc-for:1701 | schema:inDefinedTermSet | anzsrc-for: |
138 | ″ | schema:name | Psychology |
139 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
140 | sg:person.01042356506.18 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:grid.411843.b |
141 | ″ | schema:familyName | Heijl |
142 | ″ | schema:givenName | Anders |
143 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01042356506.18 |
144 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
145 | sg:person.012274436413.00 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:grid.4514.4 |
146 | ″ | schema:familyName | Lindgren |
147 | ″ | schema:givenName | Georg |
148 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.012274436413.00 |
149 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
150 | sg:person.01237061656.70 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:grid.4514.4 |
151 | ″ | schema:familyName | Olsson |
152 | ″ | schema:givenName | Jonny |
153 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01237061656.70 |
154 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
155 | grid-institutes:grid.411843.b | schema:alternateName | Dept of Ophthalmology, University of Lund, Malmö General Hospital, S-21401, Malmö, Sweden |
156 | ″ | schema:name | Dept of Ophthalmology, University of Lund, Malmö General Hospital, S-21401, Malmö, Sweden |
157 | ″ | ″ | Malmö and Lund, Sweden |
158 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |
159 | grid-institutes:grid.4514.4 | schema:alternateName | Dept of Mathematical Statistics, University of Lund, PO Box 118, S-22100, Lund, Sweden |
160 | ″ | schema:name | Dept of Mathematical Statistics, University of Lund, PO Box 118, S-22100, Lund, Sweden |
161 | ″ | ″ | Malmö and Lund, Sweden |
162 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |