Ontology type: schema:Chapter
2012-10-25
AUTHORSMichael S. Cox , Patrick D. Gerard
ABSTRACTSite-specific crop and soil management has the potential to increase crop production efficiency and decrease environmental impact. Determination of management zones is essential for site-specific management to be successful. These zones delineate portions of the field with the same yield limiting factors such that these factors can be managed independent of the rest of the field. However, spatial and temporal variability can confound zone delineation, thus stability of the zones must be ensured. Zone delineation has typically followed one of two methods. The first method defines areas of the field using the variability in crop yield while the second uses the variability of soil properties that might influence yield. Cluster analysis has commonly been used as a pattern recognition method to identify stable zones based on yield data. After the yield zones have been classified, soil properties can be related to the zones and be managed on a site specific basis. These soil properties can be found using directed sampling, intense soil survey data or some form of remote sensing. The second method of determining management zones used the spatial variability of soil physical or chemical properties to define the management areas. The high cost of intensive soil sampling needed for this method proved to be a limitation. Soil electrical conductivity (ECa) has emerged as an inexpensive way of identifying soil variability and has been used in many studies to relate soil differences to crop yield. These differences were typically related to changes in soil series or soil water availability. While zone delineation has shown to be successful in many crops, there is little information available on zones changes between crops in a rotation.The objectives of this study were to determine if yield classes change between crops within a soybean-corn-soybean rotation and whether soil properties can predict the yield classes or the year-to-year changes. A percentile classification method was used to categorize 3 years of yield in two fields into low, medium and high yield classes. There was significant agreement in yield classifications between years in both fields. Linear discriminant analysis predicted yield class based on soil properties correctly 10–66% of the time in Field 1 and in Field 233–100% of the time. There was little consistency in soil properties used to make class predictions in Field 1 but soil apparent electrical conductivity did appear in four of the six discriminant functions. Field 2 had a great deal of consistency in soil parameters that classified yield from year to year. Soil test K and Mg were present in all discriminant functions while Ca, P, texture and ECa were present in five of the six. Of the years where at least one variable was found to be useful in discrimination, ECa was present in both fields. This suggests that the management zones based on these soil properties may increase production efficiency. More... »
PAGES223-240
Sustainable Agriculture Reviews
ISBN
978-94-007-5448-5
978-94-007-5449-2
http://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/978-94-007-5449-2_9
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5449-2_9
DIMENSIONShttps://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1000578512
JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.
TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT
[
{
"@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json",
"about": [
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/05",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Environmental Sciences",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/0503",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Soil Sciences",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
}
],
"author": [
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Mississippi State University, 9555, 39762, Mississippi, MS, USA",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.260120.7",
"name": [
"Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Mississippi State University, 9555, 39762, Mississippi, MS, USA"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Cox",
"givenName": "Michael S.",
"id": "sg:person.011120672637.47",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.011120672637.47"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Department of Mathematical Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.26090.3d",
"name": [
"Department of Mathematical Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Gerard",
"givenName": "Patrick D.",
"id": "sg:person.0644130544.49",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0644130544.49"
],
"type": "Person"
}
],
"datePublished": "2012-10-25",
"datePublishedReg": "2012-10-25",
"description": "Site-specific crop and soil management has the potential to increase crop production efficiency and decrease environmental impact. Determination of management zones is essential for site-specific management to be successful. These zones delineate portions of the field with the same yield limiting factors such that these factors can be managed independent of the rest of the field. However, spatial and temporal variability can confound zone delineation, thus stability of the zones must be ensured. Zone delineation has typically followed one of two methods. The first method defines areas of the field using the variability in crop yield while the second uses the variability of soil properties that might influence yield. Cluster analysis has commonly been used as a pattern recognition method to identify stable zones based on yield data. After the yield zones have been classified, soil properties can be related to the zones and be managed on a site specific basis. These soil properties can be found using directed sampling, intense soil survey data or some form of remote sensing. The second method of determining management zones used the spatial variability of soil physical or chemical properties to define the management areas. The high cost of intensive soil sampling needed for this method proved to be a limitation. Soil electrical conductivity (ECa) has emerged as an inexpensive way of identifying soil variability and has been used in many studies to relate soil differences to crop yield. These differences were typically related to changes in soil series or soil water availability. While zone delineation has shown to be successful in many crops, there is little information available on zones changes between crops in a rotation.The objectives of this study were to determine if yield classes change between crops within a soybean-corn-soybean rotation and whether soil properties can predict the yield classes or the year-to-year changes. A percentile classification method was used to categorize 3 years of yield in two fields into low, medium and high yield classes. There was significant agreement in yield classifications between years in both fields. Linear discriminant analysis predicted yield class based on soil properties correctly 10\u201366% of the time in Field 1 and in Field 233\u2013100% of the time. There was little consistency in soil properties used to make class predictions in Field 1 but soil apparent electrical conductivity did appear in four of the six discriminant functions. Field 2 had a great deal of consistency in soil parameters that classified yield from year to year. Soil test K and Mg were present in all discriminant functions while Ca, P, texture and ECa were present in five of the six. Of the years where at least one variable was found to be useful in discrimination, ECa was present in both fields. This suggests that the management zones based on these soil properties may increase production efficiency.",
"editor": [
{
"familyName": "Lichtfouse",
"givenName": "Eric",
"type": "Person"
}
],
"genre": "chapter",
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/978-94-007-5449-2_9",
"inLanguage": "en",
"isAccessibleForFree": false,
"isPartOf": {
"isbn": [
"978-94-007-5448-5",
"978-94-007-5449-2"
],
"name": "Sustainable Agriculture Reviews",
"type": "Book"
},
"keywords": [
"soil properties",
"management zones",
"zone delineation",
"yield class",
"soil apparent electrical conductivity",
"site-specific crop",
"soil survey data",
"field 1",
"soil electrical conductivity",
"site-specific management",
"soil test K",
"soil water availability",
"apparent electrical conductivity",
"management zone delineation",
"site-specific basis",
"years of yield",
"high yield classes",
"soil management",
"intensive soil",
"soil differences",
"soil series",
"soil variability",
"soil parameters",
"soybean rotation",
"electrical conductivity",
"water availability",
"crop production efficiency",
"management areas",
"spatial variability",
"crop yield",
"remote sensing",
"temporal variability",
"environmental impacts",
"field 2",
"yield classification",
"crops",
"chemical properties",
"soil",
"year changes",
"yield data",
"same yield",
"cluster analysis",
"variability",
"zone",
"specific basis",
"little information",
"zone changes",
"stable zone",
"yield zone",
"delineation",
"discriminant function",
"management",
"area",
"little consistency",
"survey data",
"yield",
"discriminant analysis",
"changes",
"availability",
"Mg",
"inexpensive way",
"classification method",
"texture",
"impact",
"conductivity",
"sensing",
"years",
"Ca",
"production efficiency",
"significant agreement",
"field",
"rotation",
"classification",
"factors",
"differences",
"variables",
"data",
"objective",
"potential",
"high cost",
"study",
"portion",
"class",
"prediction",
"great deal",
"analysis",
"limitations",
"information",
"linear discriminant analysis",
"properties",
"time",
"class prediction",
"efficiency",
"basis",
"method",
"consistency",
"way",
"cost",
"determination",
"parameters",
"form",
"function",
"rest",
"stability",
"deal",
"series",
"first method",
"discrimination",
"second method",
"agreement",
"pattern recognition methods",
"recognition method"
],
"name": "Crop and Soil Management Zone Delineation Based on Soil Property or Yield Classification",
"pagination": "223-240",
"productId": [
{
"name": "dimensions_id",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"pub.1000578512"
]
},
{
"name": "doi",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"10.1007/978-94-007-5449-2_9"
]
}
],
"publisher": {
"name": "Springer Nature",
"type": "Organisation"
},
"sameAs": [
"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5449-2_9",
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1000578512"
],
"sdDataset": "chapters",
"sdDatePublished": "2022-05-20T07:49",
"sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/",
"sdPublisher": {
"name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project",
"type": "Organization"
},
"sdSource": "s3://com-springernature-scigraph/baseset/20220519/entities/gbq_results/chapter/chapter_79.jsonl",
"type": "Chapter",
"url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5449-2_9"
}
]
Download the RDF metadata as: json-ld nt turtle xml License info
JSON-LD is a popular format for linked data which is fully compatible with JSON.
curl -H 'Accept: application/ld+json' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/978-94-007-5449-2_9'
N-Triples is a line-based linked data format ideal for batch operations.
curl -H 'Accept: application/n-triples' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/978-94-007-5449-2_9'
Turtle is a human-readable linked data format.
curl -H 'Accept: text/turtle' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/978-94-007-5449-2_9'
RDF/XML is a standard XML format for linked data.
curl -H 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/978-94-007-5449-2_9'
This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.
182 TRIPLES
23 PREDICATES
137 URIs
130 LITERALS
7 BLANK NODES
Subject | Predicate | Object | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | sg:pub.10.1007/978-94-007-5449-2_9 | schema:about | anzsrc-for:05 |
2 | ″ | ″ | anzsrc-for:0503 |
3 | ″ | schema:author | Nedd9299dfee04c3ba92db9292e5930b8 |
4 | ″ | schema:datePublished | 2012-10-25 |
5 | ″ | schema:datePublishedReg | 2012-10-25 |
6 | ″ | schema:description | Site-specific crop and soil management has the potential to increase crop production efficiency and decrease environmental impact. Determination of management zones is essential for site-specific management to be successful. These zones delineate portions of the field with the same yield limiting factors such that these factors can be managed independent of the rest of the field. However, spatial and temporal variability can confound zone delineation, thus stability of the zones must be ensured. Zone delineation has typically followed one of two methods. The first method defines areas of the field using the variability in crop yield while the second uses the variability of soil properties that might influence yield. Cluster analysis has commonly been used as a pattern recognition method to identify stable zones based on yield data. After the yield zones have been classified, soil properties can be related to the zones and be managed on a site specific basis. These soil properties can be found using directed sampling, intense soil survey data or some form of remote sensing. The second method of determining management zones used the spatial variability of soil physical or chemical properties to define the management areas. The high cost of intensive soil sampling needed for this method proved to be a limitation. Soil electrical conductivity (ECa) has emerged as an inexpensive way of identifying soil variability and has been used in many studies to relate soil differences to crop yield. These differences were typically related to changes in soil series or soil water availability. While zone delineation has shown to be successful in many crops, there is little information available on zones changes between crops in a rotation.The objectives of this study were to determine if yield classes change between crops within a soybean-corn-soybean rotation and whether soil properties can predict the yield classes or the year-to-year changes. A percentile classification method was used to categorize 3 years of yield in two fields into low, medium and high yield classes. There was significant agreement in yield classifications between years in both fields. Linear discriminant analysis predicted yield class based on soil properties correctly 10–66% of the time in Field 1 and in Field 233–100% of the time. There was little consistency in soil properties used to make class predictions in Field 1 but soil apparent electrical conductivity did appear in four of the six discriminant functions. Field 2 had a great deal of consistency in soil parameters that classified yield from year to year. Soil test K and Mg were present in all discriminant functions while Ca, P, texture and ECa were present in five of the six. Of the years where at least one variable was found to be useful in discrimination, ECa was present in both fields. This suggests that the management zones based on these soil properties may increase production efficiency. |
7 | ″ | schema:editor | Ne4815db3f9364d0b899985f41734776f |
8 | ″ | schema:genre | chapter |
9 | ″ | schema:inLanguage | en |
10 | ″ | schema:isAccessibleForFree | false |
11 | ″ | schema:isPartOf | N408a81b65294452eb24162048e3f870e |
12 | ″ | schema:keywords | Ca |
13 | ″ | ″ | Mg |
14 | ″ | ″ | agreement |
15 | ″ | ″ | analysis |
16 | ″ | ″ | apparent electrical conductivity |
17 | ″ | ″ | area |
18 | ″ | ″ | availability |
19 | ″ | ″ | basis |
20 | ″ | ″ | changes |
21 | ″ | ″ | chemical properties |
22 | ″ | ″ | class |
23 | ″ | ″ | class prediction |
24 | ″ | ″ | classification |
25 | ″ | ″ | classification method |
26 | ″ | ″ | cluster analysis |
27 | ″ | ″ | conductivity |
28 | ″ | ″ | consistency |
29 | ″ | ″ | cost |
30 | ″ | ″ | crop production efficiency |
31 | ″ | ″ | crop yield |
32 | ″ | ″ | crops |
33 | ″ | ″ | data |
34 | ″ | ″ | deal |
35 | ″ | ″ | delineation |
36 | ″ | ″ | determination |
37 | ″ | ″ | differences |
38 | ″ | ″ | discriminant analysis |
39 | ″ | ″ | discriminant function |
40 | ″ | ″ | discrimination |
41 | ″ | ″ | efficiency |
42 | ″ | ″ | electrical conductivity |
43 | ″ | ″ | environmental impacts |
44 | ″ | ″ | factors |
45 | ″ | ″ | field |
46 | ″ | ″ | field 1 |
47 | ″ | ″ | field 2 |
48 | ″ | ″ | first method |
49 | ″ | ″ | form |
50 | ″ | ″ | function |
51 | ″ | ″ | great deal |
52 | ″ | ″ | high cost |
53 | ″ | ″ | high yield classes |
54 | ″ | ″ | impact |
55 | ″ | ″ | inexpensive way |
56 | ″ | ″ | information |
57 | ″ | ″ | intensive soil |
58 | ″ | ″ | limitations |
59 | ″ | ″ | linear discriminant analysis |
60 | ″ | ″ | little consistency |
61 | ″ | ″ | little information |
62 | ″ | ″ | management |
63 | ″ | ″ | management areas |
64 | ″ | ″ | management zone delineation |
65 | ″ | ″ | management zones |
66 | ″ | ″ | method |
67 | ″ | ″ | objective |
68 | ″ | ″ | parameters |
69 | ″ | ″ | pattern recognition methods |
70 | ″ | ″ | portion |
71 | ″ | ″ | potential |
72 | ″ | ″ | prediction |
73 | ″ | ″ | production efficiency |
74 | ″ | ″ | properties |
75 | ″ | ″ | recognition method |
76 | ″ | ″ | remote sensing |
77 | ″ | ″ | rest |
78 | ″ | ″ | rotation |
79 | ″ | ″ | same yield |
80 | ″ | ″ | second method |
81 | ″ | ″ | sensing |
82 | ″ | ″ | series |
83 | ″ | ″ | significant agreement |
84 | ″ | ″ | site-specific basis |
85 | ″ | ″ | site-specific crop |
86 | ″ | ″ | site-specific management |
87 | ″ | ″ | soil |
88 | ″ | ″ | soil apparent electrical conductivity |
89 | ″ | ″ | soil differences |
90 | ″ | ″ | soil electrical conductivity |
91 | ″ | ″ | soil management |
92 | ″ | ″ | soil parameters |
93 | ″ | ″ | soil properties |
94 | ″ | ″ | soil series |
95 | ″ | ″ | soil survey data |
96 | ″ | ″ | soil test K |
97 | ″ | ″ | soil variability |
98 | ″ | ″ | soil water availability |
99 | ″ | ″ | soybean rotation |
100 | ″ | ″ | spatial variability |
101 | ″ | ″ | specific basis |
102 | ″ | ″ | stability |
103 | ″ | ″ | stable zone |
104 | ″ | ″ | study |
105 | ″ | ″ | survey data |
106 | ″ | ″ | temporal variability |
107 | ″ | ″ | texture |
108 | ″ | ″ | time |
109 | ″ | ″ | variability |
110 | ″ | ″ | variables |
111 | ″ | ″ | water availability |
112 | ″ | ″ | way |
113 | ″ | ″ | year changes |
114 | ″ | ″ | years |
115 | ″ | ″ | years of yield |
116 | ″ | ″ | yield |
117 | ″ | ″ | yield class |
118 | ″ | ″ | yield classification |
119 | ″ | ″ | yield data |
120 | ″ | ″ | yield zone |
121 | ″ | ″ | zone |
122 | ″ | ″ | zone changes |
123 | ″ | ″ | zone delineation |
124 | ″ | schema:name | Crop and Soil Management Zone Delineation Based on Soil Property or Yield Classification |
125 | ″ | schema:pagination | 223-240 |
126 | ″ | schema:productId | N85df1a2e526d47d28cd4b2530f8d557b |
127 | ″ | ″ | Nafd127056a864b6280bf4bba38085b99 |
128 | ″ | schema:publisher | N69a4b09fc13c4026a0fa4992fd3113ad |
129 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1000578512 |
130 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5449-2_9 |
131 | ″ | schema:sdDatePublished | 2022-05-20T07:49 |
132 | ″ | schema:sdLicense | https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/ |
133 | ″ | schema:sdPublisher | N6e056636716b451eac57a121ba15d15b |
134 | ″ | schema:url | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5449-2_9 |
135 | ″ | sgo:license | sg:explorer/license/ |
136 | ″ | sgo:sdDataset | chapters |
137 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Chapter |
138 | N408a81b65294452eb24162048e3f870e | schema:isbn | 978-94-007-5448-5 |
139 | ″ | ″ | 978-94-007-5449-2 |
140 | ″ | schema:name | Sustainable Agriculture Reviews |
141 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Book |
142 | N69a4b09fc13c4026a0fa4992fd3113ad | schema:name | Springer Nature |
143 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organisation |
144 | N6e056636716b451eac57a121ba15d15b | schema:name | Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project |
145 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |
146 | N85df1a2e526d47d28cd4b2530f8d557b | schema:name | dimensions_id |
147 | ″ | schema:value | pub.1000578512 |
148 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PropertyValue |
149 | N8a930ebc4ec34a30b5d9ec4cb8ae8bdb | rdf:first | sg:person.0644130544.49 |
150 | ″ | rdf:rest | rdf:nil |
151 | N9ddc770abbb4442ca81c6ca131e04ccd | schema:familyName | Lichtfouse |
152 | ″ | schema:givenName | Eric |
153 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
154 | Nafd127056a864b6280bf4bba38085b99 | schema:name | doi |
155 | ″ | schema:value | 10.1007/978-94-007-5449-2_9 |
156 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PropertyValue |
157 | Ne4815db3f9364d0b899985f41734776f | rdf:first | N9ddc770abbb4442ca81c6ca131e04ccd |
158 | ″ | rdf:rest | rdf:nil |
159 | Nedd9299dfee04c3ba92db9292e5930b8 | rdf:first | sg:person.011120672637.47 |
160 | ″ | rdf:rest | N8a930ebc4ec34a30b5d9ec4cb8ae8bdb |
161 | anzsrc-for:05 | schema:inDefinedTermSet | anzsrc-for: |
162 | ″ | schema:name | Environmental Sciences |
163 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
164 | anzsrc-for:0503 | schema:inDefinedTermSet | anzsrc-for: |
165 | ″ | schema:name | Soil Sciences |
166 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
167 | sg:person.011120672637.47 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:grid.260120.7 |
168 | ″ | schema:familyName | Cox |
169 | ″ | schema:givenName | Michael S. |
170 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.011120672637.47 |
171 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
172 | sg:person.0644130544.49 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:grid.26090.3d |
173 | ″ | schema:familyName | Gerard |
174 | ″ | schema:givenName | Patrick D. |
175 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0644130544.49 |
176 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
177 | grid-institutes:grid.260120.7 | schema:alternateName | Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Mississippi State University, 9555, 39762, Mississippi, MS, USA |
178 | ″ | schema:name | Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Mississippi State University, 9555, 39762, Mississippi, MS, USA |
179 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |
180 | grid-institutes:grid.26090.3d | schema:alternateName | Department of Mathematical Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA |
181 | ″ | schema:name | Department of Mathematical Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA |
182 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |