Crop and Soil Management Zone Delineation Based on Soil Property or Yield Classification View Full Text


Ontology type: schema:Chapter     


Chapter Info

DATE

2012-10-25

AUTHORS

Michael S. Cox , Patrick D. Gerard

ABSTRACT

Site-specific crop and soil management has the potential to increase crop production efficiency and decrease environmental impact. Determination of management zones is essential for site-specific management to be successful. These zones delineate portions of the field with the same yield limiting factors such that these factors can be managed independent of the rest of the field. However, spatial and temporal variability can confound zone delineation, thus stability of the zones must be ensured. Zone delineation has typically followed one of two methods. The first method defines areas of the field using the variability in crop yield while the second uses the variability of soil properties that might influence yield. Cluster analysis has commonly been used as a pattern recognition method to identify stable zones based on yield data. After the yield zones have been classified, soil properties can be related to the zones and be managed on a site specific basis. These soil properties can be found using directed sampling, intense soil survey data or some form of remote sensing. The second method of determining management zones used the spatial variability of soil physical or chemical properties to define the management areas. The high cost of intensive soil sampling needed for this method proved to be a limitation. Soil electrical conductivity (ECa) has emerged as an inexpensive way of identifying soil variability and has been used in many studies to relate soil differences to crop yield. These differences were typically related to changes in soil series or soil water availability. While zone delineation has shown to be successful in many crops, there is little information available on zones changes between crops in a rotation.The objectives of this study were to determine if yield classes change between crops within a soybean-corn-soybean rotation and whether soil properties can predict the yield classes or the year-to-year changes. A percentile classification method was used to categorize 3 years of yield in two fields into low, medium and high yield classes. There was significant agreement in yield classifications between years in both fields. Linear discriminant analysis predicted yield class based on soil properties correctly 10–66% of the time in Field 1 and in Field 233–100% of the time. There was little consistency in soil properties used to make class predictions in Field 1 but soil apparent electrical conductivity did appear in four of the six discriminant functions. Field 2 had a great deal of consistency in soil parameters that classified yield from year to year. Soil test K and Mg were present in all discriminant functions while Ca, P, texture and ECa were present in five of the six. Of the years where at least one variable was found to be useful in discrimination, ECa was present in both fields. This suggests that the management zones based on these soil properties may increase production efficiency. More... »

PAGES

223-240

Identifiers

URI

http://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/978-94-007-5449-2_9

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5449-2_9

DIMENSIONS

https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1000578512


Indexing Status Check whether this publication has been indexed by Scopus and Web Of Science using the SN Indexing Status Tool
Incoming Citations Browse incoming citations for this publication using opencitations.net

JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.

TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT

[
  {
    "@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json", 
    "about": [
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/05", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "name": "Environmental Sciences", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/0503", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "name": "Soil Sciences", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }
    ], 
    "author": [
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Mississippi State University, 9555, 39762, Mississippi, MS, USA", 
          "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.260120.7", 
          "name": [
            "Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Mississippi State University, 9555, 39762, Mississippi, MS, USA"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Cox", 
        "givenName": "Michael S.", 
        "id": "sg:person.011120672637.47", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.011120672637.47"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }, 
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "Department of Mathematical Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA", 
          "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.26090.3d", 
          "name": [
            "Department of Mathematical Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Gerard", 
        "givenName": "Patrick D.", 
        "id": "sg:person.0644130544.49", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0644130544.49"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }
    ], 
    "datePublished": "2012-10-25", 
    "datePublishedReg": "2012-10-25", 
    "description": "Site-specific crop and soil management has the potential to increase crop production efficiency and decrease environmental impact. Determination of management zones is essential for site-specific management to be successful. These zones delineate portions of the field with the same yield limiting factors such that these factors can be managed independent of the rest of the field. However, spatial and temporal variability can confound zone delineation, thus stability of the zones must be ensured. Zone delineation has typically followed one of two methods. The first method defines areas of the field using the variability in crop yield while the second uses the variability of soil properties that might influence yield. Cluster analysis has commonly been used as a pattern recognition method to identify stable zones based on yield data. After the yield zones have been classified, soil properties can be related to the zones and be managed on a site specific basis. These soil properties can be found using directed sampling, intense soil survey data or some form of remote sensing. The second method of determining management zones used the spatial variability of soil physical or chemical properties to define the management areas. The high cost of intensive soil sampling needed for this method proved to be a limitation. Soil electrical conductivity (ECa) has emerged as an inexpensive way of identifying soil variability and has been used in many studies to relate soil differences to crop yield. These differences were typically related to changes in soil series or soil water availability. While zone delineation has shown to be successful in many crops, there is little information available on zones changes between crops in a rotation.The objectives of this study were to determine if yield classes change between crops within a soybean-corn-soybean rotation and whether soil properties can predict the yield classes or the year-to-year changes. A percentile classification method was used to categorize 3 years of yield in two fields into low, medium and high yield classes. There was significant agreement in yield classifications between years in both fields. Linear discriminant analysis predicted yield class based on soil properties correctly 10\u201366% of the time in Field 1 and in Field 233\u2013100% of the time. There was little consistency in soil properties used to make class predictions in Field 1 but soil apparent electrical conductivity did appear in four of the six discriminant functions. Field 2 had a great deal of consistency in soil parameters that classified yield from year to year. Soil test K and Mg were present in all discriminant functions while Ca, P, texture and ECa were present in five of the six. Of the years where at least one variable was found to be useful in discrimination, ECa was present in both fields. This suggests that the management zones based on these soil properties may increase production efficiency.", 
    "editor": [
      {
        "familyName": "Lichtfouse", 
        "givenName": "Eric", 
        "type": "Person"
      }
    ], 
    "genre": "chapter", 
    "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/978-94-007-5449-2_9", 
    "inLanguage": "en", 
    "isAccessibleForFree": false, 
    "isPartOf": {
      "isbn": [
        "978-94-007-5448-5", 
        "978-94-007-5449-2"
      ], 
      "name": "Sustainable Agriculture Reviews", 
      "type": "Book"
    }, 
    "keywords": [
      "soil properties", 
      "management zones", 
      "zone delineation", 
      "yield class", 
      "soil apparent electrical conductivity", 
      "site-specific crop", 
      "soil survey data", 
      "field 1", 
      "soil electrical conductivity", 
      "site-specific management", 
      "soil test K", 
      "soil water availability", 
      "apparent electrical conductivity", 
      "management zone delineation", 
      "site-specific basis", 
      "years of yield", 
      "high yield classes", 
      "soil management", 
      "intensive soil", 
      "soil differences", 
      "soil series", 
      "soil variability", 
      "soil parameters", 
      "soybean rotation", 
      "electrical conductivity", 
      "water availability", 
      "crop production efficiency", 
      "management areas", 
      "spatial variability", 
      "crop yield", 
      "remote sensing", 
      "temporal variability", 
      "environmental impacts", 
      "field 2", 
      "yield classification", 
      "crops", 
      "chemical properties", 
      "soil", 
      "year changes", 
      "yield data", 
      "same yield", 
      "cluster analysis", 
      "variability", 
      "zone", 
      "specific basis", 
      "little information", 
      "zone changes", 
      "stable zone", 
      "yield zone", 
      "delineation", 
      "discriminant function", 
      "management", 
      "area", 
      "little consistency", 
      "survey data", 
      "yield", 
      "discriminant analysis", 
      "changes", 
      "availability", 
      "Mg", 
      "inexpensive way", 
      "classification method", 
      "texture", 
      "impact", 
      "conductivity", 
      "sensing", 
      "years", 
      "Ca", 
      "production efficiency", 
      "significant agreement", 
      "field", 
      "rotation", 
      "classification", 
      "factors", 
      "differences", 
      "variables", 
      "data", 
      "objective", 
      "potential", 
      "high cost", 
      "study", 
      "portion", 
      "class", 
      "prediction", 
      "great deal", 
      "analysis", 
      "limitations", 
      "information", 
      "linear discriminant analysis", 
      "properties", 
      "time", 
      "class prediction", 
      "efficiency", 
      "basis", 
      "method", 
      "consistency", 
      "way", 
      "cost", 
      "determination", 
      "parameters", 
      "form", 
      "function", 
      "rest", 
      "stability", 
      "deal", 
      "series", 
      "first method", 
      "discrimination", 
      "second method", 
      "agreement", 
      "pattern recognition methods", 
      "recognition method"
    ], 
    "name": "Crop and Soil Management Zone Delineation Based on Soil Property or Yield Classification", 
    "pagination": "223-240", 
    "productId": [
      {
        "name": "dimensions_id", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "pub.1000578512"
        ]
      }, 
      {
        "name": "doi", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "10.1007/978-94-007-5449-2_9"
        ]
      }
    ], 
    "publisher": {
      "name": "Springer Nature", 
      "type": "Organisation"
    }, 
    "sameAs": [
      "https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5449-2_9", 
      "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1000578512"
    ], 
    "sdDataset": "chapters", 
    "sdDatePublished": "2022-05-20T07:49", 
    "sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/", 
    "sdPublisher": {
      "name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project", 
      "type": "Organization"
    }, 
    "sdSource": "s3://com-springernature-scigraph/baseset/20220519/entities/gbq_results/chapter/chapter_79.jsonl", 
    "type": "Chapter", 
    "url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5449-2_9"
  }
]
 

Download the RDF metadata as:  json-ld nt turtle xml License info

HOW TO GET THIS DATA PROGRAMMATICALLY:

JSON-LD is a popular format for linked data which is fully compatible with JSON.

curl -H 'Accept: application/ld+json' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/978-94-007-5449-2_9'

N-Triples is a line-based linked data format ideal for batch operations.

curl -H 'Accept: application/n-triples' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/978-94-007-5449-2_9'

Turtle is a human-readable linked data format.

curl -H 'Accept: text/turtle' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/978-94-007-5449-2_9'

RDF/XML is a standard XML format for linked data.

curl -H 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/978-94-007-5449-2_9'


 

This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.

182 TRIPLES      23 PREDICATES      137 URIs      130 LITERALS      7 BLANK NODES

Subject Predicate Object
1 sg:pub.10.1007/978-94-007-5449-2_9 schema:about anzsrc-for:05
2 anzsrc-for:0503
3 schema:author Nedd9299dfee04c3ba92db9292e5930b8
4 schema:datePublished 2012-10-25
5 schema:datePublishedReg 2012-10-25
6 schema:description Site-specific crop and soil management has the potential to increase crop production efficiency and decrease environmental impact. Determination of management zones is essential for site-specific management to be successful. These zones delineate portions of the field with the same yield limiting factors such that these factors can be managed independent of the rest of the field. However, spatial and temporal variability can confound zone delineation, thus stability of the zones must be ensured. Zone delineation has typically followed one of two methods. The first method defines areas of the field using the variability in crop yield while the second uses the variability of soil properties that might influence yield. Cluster analysis has commonly been used as a pattern recognition method to identify stable zones based on yield data. After the yield zones have been classified, soil properties can be related to the zones and be managed on a site specific basis. These soil properties can be found using directed sampling, intense soil survey data or some form of remote sensing. The second method of determining management zones used the spatial variability of soil physical or chemical properties to define the management areas. The high cost of intensive soil sampling needed for this method proved to be a limitation. Soil electrical conductivity (ECa) has emerged as an inexpensive way of identifying soil variability and has been used in many studies to relate soil differences to crop yield. These differences were typically related to changes in soil series or soil water availability. While zone delineation has shown to be successful in many crops, there is little information available on zones changes between crops in a rotation.The objectives of this study were to determine if yield classes change between crops within a soybean-corn-soybean rotation and whether soil properties can predict the yield classes or the year-to-year changes. A percentile classification method was used to categorize 3 years of yield in two fields into low, medium and high yield classes. There was significant agreement in yield classifications between years in both fields. Linear discriminant analysis predicted yield class based on soil properties correctly 10–66% of the time in Field 1 and in Field 233–100% of the time. There was little consistency in soil properties used to make class predictions in Field 1 but soil apparent electrical conductivity did appear in four of the six discriminant functions. Field 2 had a great deal of consistency in soil parameters that classified yield from year to year. Soil test K and Mg were present in all discriminant functions while Ca, P, texture and ECa were present in five of the six. Of the years where at least one variable was found to be useful in discrimination, ECa was present in both fields. This suggests that the management zones based on these soil properties may increase production efficiency.
7 schema:editor Ne4815db3f9364d0b899985f41734776f
8 schema:genre chapter
9 schema:inLanguage en
10 schema:isAccessibleForFree false
11 schema:isPartOf N408a81b65294452eb24162048e3f870e
12 schema:keywords Ca
13 Mg
14 agreement
15 analysis
16 apparent electrical conductivity
17 area
18 availability
19 basis
20 changes
21 chemical properties
22 class
23 class prediction
24 classification
25 classification method
26 cluster analysis
27 conductivity
28 consistency
29 cost
30 crop production efficiency
31 crop yield
32 crops
33 data
34 deal
35 delineation
36 determination
37 differences
38 discriminant analysis
39 discriminant function
40 discrimination
41 efficiency
42 electrical conductivity
43 environmental impacts
44 factors
45 field
46 field 1
47 field 2
48 first method
49 form
50 function
51 great deal
52 high cost
53 high yield classes
54 impact
55 inexpensive way
56 information
57 intensive soil
58 limitations
59 linear discriminant analysis
60 little consistency
61 little information
62 management
63 management areas
64 management zone delineation
65 management zones
66 method
67 objective
68 parameters
69 pattern recognition methods
70 portion
71 potential
72 prediction
73 production efficiency
74 properties
75 recognition method
76 remote sensing
77 rest
78 rotation
79 same yield
80 second method
81 sensing
82 series
83 significant agreement
84 site-specific basis
85 site-specific crop
86 site-specific management
87 soil
88 soil apparent electrical conductivity
89 soil differences
90 soil electrical conductivity
91 soil management
92 soil parameters
93 soil properties
94 soil series
95 soil survey data
96 soil test K
97 soil variability
98 soil water availability
99 soybean rotation
100 spatial variability
101 specific basis
102 stability
103 stable zone
104 study
105 survey data
106 temporal variability
107 texture
108 time
109 variability
110 variables
111 water availability
112 way
113 year changes
114 years
115 years of yield
116 yield
117 yield class
118 yield classification
119 yield data
120 yield zone
121 zone
122 zone changes
123 zone delineation
124 schema:name Crop and Soil Management Zone Delineation Based on Soil Property or Yield Classification
125 schema:pagination 223-240
126 schema:productId N85df1a2e526d47d28cd4b2530f8d557b
127 Nafd127056a864b6280bf4bba38085b99
128 schema:publisher N69a4b09fc13c4026a0fa4992fd3113ad
129 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1000578512
130 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5449-2_9
131 schema:sdDatePublished 2022-05-20T07:49
132 schema:sdLicense https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/
133 schema:sdPublisher N6e056636716b451eac57a121ba15d15b
134 schema:url https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5449-2_9
135 sgo:license sg:explorer/license/
136 sgo:sdDataset chapters
137 rdf:type schema:Chapter
138 N408a81b65294452eb24162048e3f870e schema:isbn 978-94-007-5448-5
139 978-94-007-5449-2
140 schema:name Sustainable Agriculture Reviews
141 rdf:type schema:Book
142 N69a4b09fc13c4026a0fa4992fd3113ad schema:name Springer Nature
143 rdf:type schema:Organisation
144 N6e056636716b451eac57a121ba15d15b schema:name Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project
145 rdf:type schema:Organization
146 N85df1a2e526d47d28cd4b2530f8d557b schema:name dimensions_id
147 schema:value pub.1000578512
148 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
149 N8a930ebc4ec34a30b5d9ec4cb8ae8bdb rdf:first sg:person.0644130544.49
150 rdf:rest rdf:nil
151 N9ddc770abbb4442ca81c6ca131e04ccd schema:familyName Lichtfouse
152 schema:givenName Eric
153 rdf:type schema:Person
154 Nafd127056a864b6280bf4bba38085b99 schema:name doi
155 schema:value 10.1007/978-94-007-5449-2_9
156 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
157 Ne4815db3f9364d0b899985f41734776f rdf:first N9ddc770abbb4442ca81c6ca131e04ccd
158 rdf:rest rdf:nil
159 Nedd9299dfee04c3ba92db9292e5930b8 rdf:first sg:person.011120672637.47
160 rdf:rest N8a930ebc4ec34a30b5d9ec4cb8ae8bdb
161 anzsrc-for:05 schema:inDefinedTermSet anzsrc-for:
162 schema:name Environmental Sciences
163 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
164 anzsrc-for:0503 schema:inDefinedTermSet anzsrc-for:
165 schema:name Soil Sciences
166 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
167 sg:person.011120672637.47 schema:affiliation grid-institutes:grid.260120.7
168 schema:familyName Cox
169 schema:givenName Michael S.
170 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.011120672637.47
171 rdf:type schema:Person
172 sg:person.0644130544.49 schema:affiliation grid-institutes:grid.26090.3d
173 schema:familyName Gerard
174 schema:givenName Patrick D.
175 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0644130544.49
176 rdf:type schema:Person
177 grid-institutes:grid.260120.7 schema:alternateName Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Mississippi State University, 9555, 39762, Mississippi, MS, USA
178 schema:name Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Mississippi State University, 9555, 39762, Mississippi, MS, USA
179 rdf:type schema:Organization
180 grid-institutes:grid.26090.3d schema:alternateName Department of Mathematical Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA
181 schema:name Department of Mathematical Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA
182 rdf:type schema:Organization
 




Preview window. Press ESC to close (or click here)


...