1986
AUTHORS ABSTRACTThe meeting was, in the opinion expressed by all participants, a very successful one. Each of the presentations elicited strong responses in the majority of the participants leading to an unusually vivacious and detailed discussion in which not only common ideas emerged in unexpected ways but also weak or obscure points of the individual theories where freely discussed and clarified. It soon became obvious that we had created a forum which provided an opportunity to discuss ideas which were often confined to a strange limbus of awe and contempt in previous discussions with experimental neuroscientists. A consequence of this realization was probably the absence of the aggressively competitive spirit that can easily emerge in similar groups. We attributed this in part to the fact that no representative of the staunch type of experimentalist was present at the meeting. Thus we could make uninhibited use of mathematical formalism and propose ideas that are not directly related to experimental research presently en vogue, but may well provide the framework for future experimentation. This is to be expected since at our meeting it became apparent that the goal of finding a common theoretical framework is well within reach. Especially in the discussion of the historical papers, for which the last day of the meeting was reserved, it became clear that the quite different views on the brain that are naturally held by scientists from different backgrounds can possibly be transformed into each other on the level of their mathematical representations. More... »
PAGES1-3
Brain Theory
ISBN
978-3-642-70913-5
978-3-642-70911-1
http://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/978-3-642-70911-1_1
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-70911-1_1
DIMENSIONShttps://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1001927579
JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.
TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT
[
{
"@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json",
"about": [
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/01",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Mathematical Sciences",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/0101",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Pure Mathematics",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
}
],
"author": [
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Max Planck Institut f\u00fcr Biologische Kybernetik, Spemannstra\u00dfe 38, 7400, T\u00fcbingen, Germany",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/None",
"name": [
"Max Planck Institut f\u00fcr Biologische Kybernetik, Spemannstra\u00dfe 38, 7400, T\u00fcbingen, Germany"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Braitenberg",
"givenName": "V.",
"id": "sg:person.012515726701.58",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.012515726701.58"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Max Planck Institut f\u00fcr Biologische Kybernetik, Spemannstra\u00dfe 38, 7400, T\u00fcbingen, Germany",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/None",
"name": [
"Max Planck Institut f\u00fcr Biologische Kybernetik, Spemannstra\u00dfe 38, 7400, T\u00fcbingen, Germany"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Palm",
"givenName": "G.",
"id": "sg:person.013050523435.41",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.013050523435.41"
],
"type": "Person"
}
],
"datePublished": "1986",
"datePublishedReg": "1986-01-01",
"description": "The meeting was, in the opinion expressed by all participants, a very successful one. Each of the presentations elicited strong responses in the majority of the participants leading to an unusually vivacious and detailed discussion in which not only common ideas emerged in unexpected ways but also weak or obscure points of the individual theories where freely discussed and clarified. It soon became obvious that we had created a forum which provided an opportunity to discuss ideas which were often confined to a strange limbus of awe and contempt in previous discussions with experimental neuroscientists. A consequence of this realization was probably the absence of the aggressively competitive spirit that can easily emerge in similar groups. We attributed this in part to the fact that no representative of the staunch type of experimentalist was present at the meeting. Thus we could make uninhibited use of mathematical formalism and propose ideas that are not directly related to experimental research presently en vogue, but may well provide the framework for future experimentation. This is to be expected since at our meeting it became apparent that the goal of finding a common theoretical framework is well within reach. Especially in the discussion of the historical papers, for which the last day of the meeting was reserved, it became clear that the quite different views on the brain that are naturally held by scientists from different backgrounds can possibly be transformed into each other on the level of their mathematical representations.",
"editor": [
{
"familyName": "Palm",
"givenName": "G\u00fcnther",
"type": "Person"
},
{
"familyName": "Aertsen",
"givenName": "Ad",
"type": "Person"
}
],
"genre": "chapter",
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/978-3-642-70911-1_1",
"isAccessibleForFree": false,
"isPartOf": {
"isbn": [
"978-3-642-70913-5",
"978-3-642-70911-1"
],
"name": "Brain Theory",
"type": "Book"
},
"keywords": [
"common idea",
"individual theories",
"discussion",
"idea",
"obscure points",
"previous discussions",
"historical papers",
"different views",
"brain theory",
"unexpected ways",
"common theoretical framework",
"theoretical framework",
"first meeting",
"meeting",
"detailed discussion",
"theory",
"awe",
"contempt",
"neuroscientists",
"spirit",
"mathematical formalism",
"different backgrounds",
"opinion",
"way",
"fact",
"vogue",
"framework",
"last day",
"view",
"scientists",
"forum",
"representatives",
"experimentation",
"successful ones",
"one",
"point",
"consequences",
"realization",
"competitive spirit",
"part",
"experimentalists",
"research",
"goal",
"background",
"representation",
"participants",
"opportunities",
"experimental research",
"reach",
"paper",
"presentation",
"similar groups",
"formalism",
"mathematical representation",
"response",
"majority",
"use",
"absence",
"group",
"types",
"brain",
"levels",
"report",
"strong response",
"days",
"limbus",
"experimental neuroscientists",
"uninhibited use",
"future experimentation"
],
"name": "Report of the First Meeting on Brain Theory",
"pagination": "1-3",
"productId": [
{
"name": "dimensions_id",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"pub.1001927579"
]
},
{
"name": "doi",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"10.1007/978-3-642-70911-1_1"
]
}
],
"publisher": {
"name": "Springer Nature",
"type": "Organisation"
},
"sameAs": [
"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-70911-1_1",
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1001927579"
],
"sdDataset": "chapters",
"sdDatePublished": "2022-08-04T17:20",
"sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/",
"sdPublisher": {
"name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project",
"type": "Organization"
},
"sdSource": "s3://com-springernature-scigraph/baseset/20220804/entities/gbq_results/chapter/chapter_429.jsonl",
"type": "Chapter",
"url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-70911-1_1"
}
]
Download the RDF metadata as: json-ld nt turtle xml License info
JSON-LD is a popular format for linked data which is fully compatible with JSON.
curl -H 'Accept: application/ld+json' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/978-3-642-70911-1_1'
N-Triples is a line-based linked data format ideal for batch operations.
curl -H 'Accept: application/n-triples' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/978-3-642-70911-1_1'
Turtle is a human-readable linked data format.
curl -H 'Accept: text/turtle' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/978-3-642-70911-1_1'
RDF/XML is a standard XML format for linked data.
curl -H 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/978-3-642-70911-1_1'
This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.
140 TRIPLES
22 PREDICATES
94 URIs
87 LITERALS
7 BLANK NODES
Subject | Predicate | Object | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | sg:pub.10.1007/978-3-642-70911-1_1 | schema:about | anzsrc-for:01 |
2 | ″ | ″ | anzsrc-for:0101 |
3 | ″ | schema:author | N894c83f9acb245ed8051f394627b0426 |
4 | ″ | schema:datePublished | 1986 |
5 | ″ | schema:datePublishedReg | 1986-01-01 |
6 | ″ | schema:description | The meeting was, in the opinion expressed by all participants, a very successful one. Each of the presentations elicited strong responses in the majority of the participants leading to an unusually vivacious and detailed discussion in which not only common ideas emerged in unexpected ways but also weak or obscure points of the individual theories where freely discussed and clarified. It soon became obvious that we had created a forum which provided an opportunity to discuss ideas which were often confined to a strange limbus of awe and contempt in previous discussions with experimental neuroscientists. A consequence of this realization was probably the absence of the aggressively competitive spirit that can easily emerge in similar groups. We attributed this in part to the fact that no representative of the staunch type of experimentalist was present at the meeting. Thus we could make uninhibited use of mathematical formalism and propose ideas that are not directly related to experimental research presently en vogue, but may well provide the framework for future experimentation. This is to be expected since at our meeting it became apparent that the goal of finding a common theoretical framework is well within reach. Especially in the discussion of the historical papers, for which the last day of the meeting was reserved, it became clear that the quite different views on the brain that are naturally held by scientists from different backgrounds can possibly be transformed into each other on the level of their mathematical representations. |
7 | ″ | schema:editor | Ne95647d215d448359102df24057ba653 |
8 | ″ | schema:genre | chapter |
9 | ″ | schema:isAccessibleForFree | false |
10 | ″ | schema:isPartOf | N6ddf50664e00412d983d6cd3f67f32f3 |
11 | ″ | schema:keywords | absence |
12 | ″ | ″ | awe |
13 | ″ | ″ | background |
14 | ″ | ″ | brain |
15 | ″ | ″ | brain theory |
16 | ″ | ″ | common idea |
17 | ″ | ″ | common theoretical framework |
18 | ″ | ″ | competitive spirit |
19 | ″ | ″ | consequences |
20 | ″ | ″ | contempt |
21 | ″ | ″ | days |
22 | ″ | ″ | detailed discussion |
23 | ″ | ″ | different backgrounds |
24 | ″ | ″ | different views |
25 | ″ | ″ | discussion |
26 | ″ | ″ | experimental neuroscientists |
27 | ″ | ″ | experimental research |
28 | ″ | ″ | experimentalists |
29 | ″ | ″ | experimentation |
30 | ″ | ″ | fact |
31 | ″ | ″ | first meeting |
32 | ″ | ″ | formalism |
33 | ″ | ″ | forum |
34 | ″ | ″ | framework |
35 | ″ | ″ | future experimentation |
36 | ″ | ″ | goal |
37 | ″ | ″ | group |
38 | ″ | ″ | historical papers |
39 | ″ | ″ | idea |
40 | ″ | ″ | individual theories |
41 | ″ | ″ | last day |
42 | ″ | ″ | levels |
43 | ″ | ″ | limbus |
44 | ″ | ″ | majority |
45 | ″ | ″ | mathematical formalism |
46 | ″ | ″ | mathematical representation |
47 | ″ | ″ | meeting |
48 | ″ | ″ | neuroscientists |
49 | ″ | ″ | obscure points |
50 | ″ | ″ | one |
51 | ″ | ″ | opinion |
52 | ″ | ″ | opportunities |
53 | ″ | ″ | paper |
54 | ″ | ″ | part |
55 | ″ | ″ | participants |
56 | ″ | ″ | point |
57 | ″ | ″ | presentation |
58 | ″ | ″ | previous discussions |
59 | ″ | ″ | reach |
60 | ″ | ″ | realization |
61 | ″ | ″ | report |
62 | ″ | ″ | representation |
63 | ″ | ″ | representatives |
64 | ″ | ″ | research |
65 | ″ | ″ | response |
66 | ″ | ″ | scientists |
67 | ″ | ″ | similar groups |
68 | ″ | ″ | spirit |
69 | ″ | ″ | strong response |
70 | ″ | ″ | successful ones |
71 | ″ | ″ | theoretical framework |
72 | ″ | ″ | theory |
73 | ″ | ″ | types |
74 | ″ | ″ | unexpected ways |
75 | ″ | ″ | uninhibited use |
76 | ″ | ″ | use |
77 | ″ | ″ | view |
78 | ″ | ″ | vogue |
79 | ″ | ″ | way |
80 | ″ | schema:name | Report of the First Meeting on Brain Theory |
81 | ″ | schema:pagination | 1-3 |
82 | ″ | schema:productId | N5470aa75254547e0968ececbb272cd8e |
83 | ″ | ″ | N6b2e2de36cb24cd8a63a4f48caa5070d |
84 | ″ | schema:publisher | Ne65411426b004a6cb63f3e947ccb8ba2 |
85 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1001927579 |
86 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-70911-1_1 |
87 | ″ | schema:sdDatePublished | 2022-08-04T17:20 |
88 | ″ | schema:sdLicense | https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/ |
89 | ″ | schema:sdPublisher | N1ac188b9f9cc4af593f6ef0e1fbe4308 |
90 | ″ | schema:url | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-70911-1_1 |
91 | ″ | sgo:license | sg:explorer/license/ |
92 | ″ | sgo:sdDataset | chapters |
93 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Chapter |
94 | N06796c5cff314025bf758e08446acd42 | rdf:first | sg:person.013050523435.41 |
95 | ″ | rdf:rest | rdf:nil |
96 | N1ac188b9f9cc4af593f6ef0e1fbe4308 | schema:name | Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project |
97 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |
98 | N5470aa75254547e0968ececbb272cd8e | schema:name | dimensions_id |
99 | ″ | schema:value | pub.1001927579 |
100 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PropertyValue |
101 | N6b2e2de36cb24cd8a63a4f48caa5070d | schema:name | doi |
102 | ″ | schema:value | 10.1007/978-3-642-70911-1_1 |
103 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PropertyValue |
104 | N6ddf50664e00412d983d6cd3f67f32f3 | schema:isbn | 978-3-642-70911-1 |
105 | ″ | ″ | 978-3-642-70913-5 |
106 | ″ | schema:name | Brain Theory |
107 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Book |
108 | N7087fce7011f41aa9074b44265414788 | schema:familyName | Palm |
109 | ″ | schema:givenName | Günther |
110 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
111 | N894c83f9acb245ed8051f394627b0426 | rdf:first | sg:person.012515726701.58 |
112 | ″ | rdf:rest | N06796c5cff314025bf758e08446acd42 |
113 | Na186fdb8059b482ba80cf026ff9003c9 | schema:familyName | Aertsen |
114 | ″ | schema:givenName | Ad |
115 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
116 | Ndd20a87168df435db0583552e2389ef5 | rdf:first | Na186fdb8059b482ba80cf026ff9003c9 |
117 | ″ | rdf:rest | rdf:nil |
118 | Ne65411426b004a6cb63f3e947ccb8ba2 | schema:name | Springer Nature |
119 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organisation |
120 | Ne95647d215d448359102df24057ba653 | rdf:first | N7087fce7011f41aa9074b44265414788 |
121 | ″ | rdf:rest | Ndd20a87168df435db0583552e2389ef5 |
122 | anzsrc-for:01 | schema:inDefinedTermSet | anzsrc-for: |
123 | ″ | schema:name | Mathematical Sciences |
124 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
125 | anzsrc-for:0101 | schema:inDefinedTermSet | anzsrc-for: |
126 | ″ | schema:name | Pure Mathematics |
127 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
128 | sg:person.012515726701.58 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:None |
129 | ″ | schema:familyName | Braitenberg |
130 | ″ | schema:givenName | V. |
131 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.012515726701.58 |
132 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
133 | sg:person.013050523435.41 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:None |
134 | ″ | schema:familyName | Palm |
135 | ″ | schema:givenName | G. |
136 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.013050523435.41 |
137 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
138 | grid-institutes:None | schema:alternateName | Max Planck Institut für Biologische Kybernetik, Spemannstraße 38, 7400, Tübingen, Germany |
139 | ″ | schema:name | Max Planck Institut für Biologische Kybernetik, Spemannstraße 38, 7400, Tübingen, Germany |
140 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |