JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.

TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT

[
  {
    "@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json", 
    "about": [
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/11", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "name": "Medical and Health Sciences", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/1103", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "name": "Clinical Sciences", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }
    ], 
    "author": [
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA", 
          "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.185648.6", 
          "name": [
            "Radiology Department, Skokie Hospital, 9600 Gross Point Road, 60076, Skokie, IL, USA", 
            "Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA", 
            "University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Berlin", 
        "givenName": "Leonard", 
        "id": "sg:person.01146703320.54", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01146703320.54"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }
    ], 
    "datePublished": "2016-03-29", 
    "datePublishedReg": "2016-03-29", 
    "description": "With the advent of high resolution CT, MRI, and ultrasound scanning, the frequency of radiologists\u2019 serendipitous discovery of incidental findings (colloquially referred to as \u201cincidentalomas\u201d) on radiological examinations is increasing. Incidentalomas account for approximately 20% of all findings, due to two reasons: (a) the number of hi-tech imaging exams (primarily CT) performed today, and (b) the increasing sophistication of the technology. In the early 1980s when CT scanning was in its infancy, 3 to 5 million scans were performed annually in the US. In the past few years, the annual number of CT scans performed in the US has increased exponentially to well over 80 million. In addition, the specificity of the equipment has advanced geometrically such that abnormalities and/or pseudo-abnormalities 1 mm or a fraction of 1 mm in size that were virtually \u201cinvisible\u201d before can now be seen quite easily.Statistically only 1% or less of these incidentalomas represent an early malignancy or other severe pathology. Thus, radiologists are faced with a dilemma: if they report every incidentaloma, many patients will be subjected to a cascade of costly testing, sometimes leading to biopsies or other invasive procedures, all of which on occasion may lead to complications and cause harm to the patient who was completely healthy and was never ill to begin with. On the other hand, should the radiologist decide not to report the presence of an incidentaloma, and it is later discovered that it was indeed an early malignancy and thus a fatal delay in diagnosis and treatment ensued, the patient could be permanently harmed or even die, and a medical malpractice lawsuit would almost certainly follow.What, if anything, should the radiologist report to the patient or the referring physician, when faced with an incidentaloma? Should, or must, informed consent be required? This Chapter will focus on both the moral-ethical, and the medico-legal, aspects of the incidentaloma dilemma faced everyday by radiologists as well as treating physicians.", 
    "editor": [
      {
        "familyName": "Weckbach", 
        "givenName": "Sabine", 
        "type": "Person"
      }
    ], 
    "genre": "chapter", 
    "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/174_2016_35", 
    "inLanguage": "en", 
    "isAccessibleForFree": false, 
    "isPartOf": {
      "isbn": [
        "978-3-319-42579-5", 
        "978-3-319-42581-8"
      ], 
      "name": "Incidental Radiological Findings", 
      "type": "Book"
    }, 
    "keywords": [
      "early malignancy", 
      "informed consent", 
      "high resolution CT", 
      "incidental finding", 
      "radiological examination", 
      "CT scan", 
      "incidentalomas", 
      "invasive procedures", 
      "CT scanning", 
      "radiologist's report", 
      "resolution CT", 
      "patients", 
      "imaging exams", 
      "fatal delay", 
      "severe pathology", 
      "medicolegal aspects", 
      "medical malpractice lawsuits", 
      "annual number", 
      "malignancy", 
      "radiologists", 
      "malpractice lawsuits", 
      "physicians", 
      "scans", 
      "consent", 
      "costly testing", 
      "complications", 
      "biopsy", 
      "findings", 
      "abnormalities", 
      "diagnosis", 
      "pathology", 
      "CT", 
      "MRI", 
      "serendipitous discovery", 
      "treatment", 
      "infancy", 
      "examination", 
      "scanning", 
      "exam", 
      "report", 
      "years", 
      "harm", 
      "specificity", 
      "occasions", 
      "testing", 
      "number", 
      "cascade", 
      "dilemma", 
      "procedure", 
      "presence", 
      "aspects", 
      "frequency", 
      "early 1980s", 
      "uses", 
      "advent", 
      "addition", 
      "delay", 
      "reasons", 
      "hand", 
      "fraction", 
      "discovery", 
      "size", 
      "lawsuits", 
      "chapter", 
      "equipment", 
      "today", 
      "sophistication", 
      "technology", 
      "radiologists\u2019 serendipitous discovery", 
      "hi-tech imaging exams", 
      "incidentaloma dilemma"
    ], 
    "name": "Medicolegal Aspects and Informed Consent", 
    "pagination": "25-34", 
    "productId": [
      {
        "name": "dimensions_id", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "pub.1007248942"
        ]
      }, 
      {
        "name": "doi", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "10.1007/174_2016_35"
        ]
      }
    ], 
    "publisher": {
      "name": "Springer Nature", 
      "type": "Organisation"
    }, 
    "sameAs": [
      "https://doi.org/10.1007/174_2016_35", 
      "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1007248942"
    ], 
    "sdDataset": "chapters", 
    "sdDatePublished": "2022-01-01T19:13", 
    "sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/", 
    "sdPublisher": {
      "name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project", 
      "type": "Organization"
    }, 
    "sdSource": "s3://com-springernature-scigraph/baseset/20220101/entities/gbq_results/chapter/chapter_236.jsonl", 
    "type": "Chapter", 
    "url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/174_2016_35"
  }
]

Download the RDF metadata as:  json-ld nt turtle xml License info

This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.

133 TRIPLES      23 PREDICATES      95 URIs      88 LITERALS      7 BLANK NODES