Parties, Parliament and the Brexit Process View Homepage


Ontology type: schema:MonetaryGrant     


Grant Info

YEARS

2017-2019

FUNDING AMOUNT

241040.0 GBP

ABSTRACT

The 2016 referendum vote for Brexit is already having a significant effect on British political parties and the UK Parliament. It is reshaping the divisions within and between political parties, impacting upon the strategies adopted by parties and individual MPs, and requiring Parliament to adapt its structures and procedures as the Brexit process becomes a critical area of its activity. The proposed project brings together experts drawn from the fields of law and political science, who will work with the Industry and Parliament Trust to inform their research and ensure dialogue with policymakers and the business community. The project combines analysis of the importance of institutions (e.g. parliamentary procedures and structures), and legislative and regulatory norms with an examination of the motivations and behaviour of political parties, individual MPs and the government. These are linked because internal party divisions, cross-party alliances and the differing preferences of MPs on Brexit will affect how - and how well - Parliament scrutinises the process of leaving the EU. The purpose of this project is: (1) To enhance understanding of how the Brexit vote has affected UK party politics, including divisions within and between parties, the positions and preferences of MPs, party positions in Parliament and party competition on EU issues. We will collect and analyse data on the positions on the EU issue adopted by parties and MPs since 2010, assessing how divisions within parties are changing and whether new patterns of cross-party cooperation are emerging. (2) To develop knowledge of how Parliament has responded to Brexit in terms of its structures and procedures, and how effective this response has been. We will examine the work of the new Exiting the EU select committee, the European Scrutiny Committee and other departmental select committees, collecting data on and assessing divisions and cooperation within and across these bodies. (3) To identify those areas of policy that have been most subject to conflict between and within parties and are most likely to change once the UK has left the EU. After Brexit, the UK Parliament will exercise regulatory control over a range of policy areas (e.g. environmental protection, farming, employment rights) which have hitherto been legislated for at the EU level. Parliament will make choices about how, and under what principles it wishes to legislate. We assess the extent to which MPs seek to formulate UK versions of existing EU legislation or continue to broadly adopt EU norms and standards. Our research on whether MPs behave according to traditional party affiliations, or new cross-party alliances and intra-party disputes emerge will also help to explain what factors shape the post-Brexit legislative agenda. (4) To address the needs of key stakeholders by working with our impact partner the Industry and Parliament Trust (IPT) to: (a) better understand the interests and concerns of business and industry stakeholders regarding the Brexit process and the changes that Brexit is likely to bring to their activities; (b) foster effective dialogue between business and industry stakeholders and MPs, notably through a series of seminars and workshops; and (c) provide business and industry stakeholders with clear guidance and analysis of the role and activity of Parliament and MPs in the Brexit process. (5) To maximise user engagement and public understanding by working with the Director of the ERSC UK in a Changing Europe Programme and other projects within it to: (a) synthesise and develop research on parties, Parliament and the transfer of competences; (b) disseminate our research findings to a range of stakeholders and the general public in an easily-accessible form through a variety of forums; and (c) lay the foundations for future research on the impact of Brexit. More... »

URL

https://gtr.ukri.org/project/28EDE392-51C8-4461-A5AC-39B7C6C32F9C

JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.

TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT

[
  {
    "@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json", 
    "about": [
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/16", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }
    ], 
    "amount": {
      "currency": "GBP", 
      "type": "MonetaryAmount", 
      "value": 241040.0
    }, 
    "description": "The 2016 referendum vote for Brexit is already having a significant effect on British political parties and the UK Parliament. It is reshaping the divisions within and between political parties, impacting upon the strategies adopted by parties and individual MPs, and requiring Parliament to adapt its structures and procedures as the Brexit process becomes a critical area of its activity. The proposed project brings together experts drawn from the fields of law and political science, who will work with the Industry and Parliament Trust to inform their research and ensure dialogue with policymakers and the business community.\nThe project combines analysis of the importance of institutions (e.g. parliamentary procedures and structures), and legislative and regulatory norms with an examination of the motivations and behaviour of political parties, individual MPs and the government. These are linked because internal party divisions, cross-party alliances and the differing preferences of MPs on Brexit will affect how - and how well - Parliament scrutinises the process of leaving the EU. \nThe purpose of this project is:\n(1) To enhance understanding of how the Brexit vote has affected UK party politics, including divisions within and between parties, the positions and preferences of MPs, party positions in Parliament and party competition on EU issues. We will collect and analyse data on the positions on the EU issue adopted by parties and MPs since 2010, assessing how divisions within parties are changing and whether new patterns of cross-party cooperation are emerging. \n(2) To develop knowledge of how Parliament has responded to Brexit in terms of its structures and procedures, and how effective this response has been. We will examine the work of the new Exiting the EU select committee, the European Scrutiny Committee and other departmental select committees, collecting data on and assessing divisions and cooperation within and across these bodies. \n(3) To identify those areas of policy that have been most subject to conflict between and within parties and are most likely to change once the UK has left the EU. After Brexit, the UK Parliament will exercise regulatory control over a range of policy areas (e.g. environmental protection, farming, employment rights) which have hitherto been legislated for at the EU level. Parliament will make choices about how, and under what principles it wishes to legislate. We assess the extent to which MPs seek to formulate UK versions of existing EU legislation or continue to broadly adopt EU norms and standards. Our research on whether MPs behave according to traditional party affiliations, or new cross-party alliances and intra-party disputes emerge will also help to explain what factors shape the post-Brexit legislative agenda. \n(4) To address the needs of key stakeholders by working with our impact partner the Industry and Parliament Trust (IPT) to: (a) better understand the interests and concerns of business and industry stakeholders regarding the Brexit process and the changes that Brexit is likely to bring to their activities; (b) foster effective dialogue between business and industry stakeholders and MPs, notably through a series of seminars and workshops; and (c) provide business and industry stakeholders with clear guidance and analysis of the role and activity of Parliament and MPs in the Brexit process.\n(5) To maximise user engagement and public understanding by working with the Director of the ERSC UK in a Changing Europe Programme and other projects within it to: (a) synthesise and develop research on parties, Parliament and the transfer of competences; (b) disseminate our research findings to a range of stakeholders and the general public in an easily-accessible form through a variety of forums; and (c) lay the foundations for future research on the impact of Brexit.", 
    "endDate": "2019-03-31", 
    "funder": {
      "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.434257.3", 
      "type": "Organization"
    }, 
    "id": "sg:grant.6620120", 
    "identifier": [
      {
        "name": "dimensions_id", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "grant.6620120"
        ]
      }, 
      {
        "name": "gtr_id", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "28EDE392-51C8-4461-A5AC-39B7C6C32F9C"
        ]
      }
    ], 
    "inLanguage": [
      "en"
    ], 
    "keywords": [
      "cross-party alliances", 
      "Brexit process", 
      "political parties", 
      "EU issues", 
      "individual MPs", 
      "UK Parliament", 
      "industry stakeholders", 
      "internal party divisions", 
      "Select Committee", 
      "British political parties", 
      "areas of policy", 
      "activity of parliaments", 
      "importance of institutions", 
      "impact of Brexit", 
      "transfer of competences", 
      "range of stakeholders", 
      "variety of forums", 
      "party politics", 
      "party competition", 
      "party positions", 
      "policy areas", 
      "political science", 
      "party divisions", 
      "scrutiny committees", 
      "legislative agenda", 
      "party affiliation", 
      "EU norms", 
      "departmental select committees", 
      "Brexit vote", 
      "referendum vote", 
      "EU level", 
      "Brexit", 
      "Parliament", 
      "field of law", 
      "concerns of business", 
      "regulatory norms", 
      "parties", 
      "business community", 
      "key stakeholders", 
      "effective dialogue", 
      "public understanding", 
      "series of seminars", 
      "MPs behave", 
      "Europe programme", 
      "new patterns", 
      "stakeholders", 
      "EU legislation", 
      "vote", 
      "research findings", 
      "alliance", 
      "analyse data", 
      "EU", 
      "dialogue", 
      "business", 
      "general public", 
      "norms", 
      "trust", 
      "cooperation", 
      "future research", 
      "UK", 
      "project", 
      "MP", 
      "politics", 
      "Committee", 
      "accessible form", 
      "agenda", 
      "government", 
      "division", 
      "issues", 
      "research", 
      "clear guidance", 
      "policy", 
      "policymakers", 
      "user engagement", 
      "conflict", 
      "UK version", 
      "legislation", 
      "institutions", 
      "disputes", 
      "forum", 
      "engagement", 
      "public", 
      "community", 
      "critical areas", 
      "affiliation", 
      "understanding", 
      "regulatory control", 
      "preferences", 
      "industry", 
      "partners", 
      "law", 
      "position", 
      "seminars", 
      "science", 
      "concern", 
      "competence", 
      "motivation", 
      "need", 
      "foundation", 
      "process", 
      "workshop", 
      "experts", 
      "interest", 
      "competition", 
      "directors", 
      "area", 
      "program", 
      "synthesise", 
      "hitherto", 
      "impact", 
      "extent", 
      "knowledge", 
      "exiting", 
      "strategies", 
      "choice", 
      "importance", 
      "findings", 
      "principles", 
      "form", 
      "purpose", 
      "body", 
      "work", 
      "role", 
      "standards", 
      "analysis", 
      "terms", 
      "guidance", 
      "changes", 
      "data", 
      "activity", 
      "factors", 
      "patterns", 
      "field", 
      "levels", 
      "variety", 
      "behavior", 
      "structure", 
      "examination", 
      "response", 
      "version", 
      "range", 
      "transfer", 
      "significant effect", 
      "series", 
      "behave", 
      "control", 
      "procedure", 
      "effect"
    ], 
    "name": "Parties, Parliament and the Brexit Process", 
    "recipient": [
      {
        "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.9918.9", 
        "type": "Organization"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.500276.6", 
        "type": "Organization"
      }, 
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/None", 
          "name": "University of Leicester", 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Cygan", 
        "givenName": "Adam", 
        "id": "sg:person.010546376331.14", 
        "type": "Person"
      }, 
      {
        "member": "sg:person.010546376331.14", 
        "roleName": "PI", 
        "type": "Role"
      }, 
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/None", 
          "name": "University of Leicester", 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Lynch", 
        "givenName": "Philip", 
        "id": "sg:person.011351610457.59", 
        "type": "Person"
      }, 
      {
        "member": "sg:person.011351610457.59", 
        "roleName": "Co-PI", 
        "type": "Role"
      }, 
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/None", 
          "name": "University of Leicester", 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Whitaker", 
        "givenName": "Richard", 
        "id": "sg:person.012147171057.32", 
        "type": "Person"
      }, 
      {
        "member": "sg:person.012147171057.32", 
        "roleName": "Co-PI", 
        "type": "Role"
      }
    ], 
    "sameAs": [
      "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/grant/grant.6620120"
    ], 
    "sdDataset": "grants", 
    "sdDatePublished": "2021-11-01T19:07", 
    "sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/", 
    "sdPublisher": {
      "name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project", 
      "type": "Organization"
    }, 
    "sdSource": "s3://com-springernature-scigraph/baseset/20211101/entities/gbq_results/grant/grant_8.jsonl", 
    "startDate": "2017-03-31", 
    "type": "MonetaryGrant", 
    "url": "https://gtr.ukri.org/project/28EDE392-51C8-4461-A5AC-39B7C6C32F9C"
  }
]
 

Download the RDF metadata as:  json-ld nt turtle xml License info

HOW TO GET THIS DATA PROGRAMMATICALLY:

JSON-LD is a popular format for linked data which is fully compatible with JSON.

curl -H 'Accept: application/ld+json' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/grant.6620120'

N-Triples is a line-based linked data format ideal for batch operations.

curl -H 'Accept: application/n-triples' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/grant.6620120'

Turtle is a human-readable linked data format.

curl -H 'Accept: text/turtle' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/grant.6620120'

RDF/XML is a standard XML format for linked data.

curl -H 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/grant.6620120'


 

This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.

213 TRIPLES      19 PREDICATES      175 URIs      164 LITERALS      7 BLANK NODES

Subject Predicate Object
1 sg:grant.6620120 schema:about anzsrc-for:16
2 schema:amount N308a706a05944cd68111b2cf6ece730d
3 schema:description The 2016 referendum vote for Brexit is already having a significant effect on British political parties and the UK Parliament. It is reshaping the divisions within and between political parties, impacting upon the strategies adopted by parties and individual MPs, and requiring Parliament to adapt its structures and procedures as the Brexit process becomes a critical area of its activity. The proposed project brings together experts drawn from the fields of law and political science, who will work with the Industry and Parliament Trust to inform their research and ensure dialogue with policymakers and the business community. The project combines analysis of the importance of institutions (e.g. parliamentary procedures and structures), and legislative and regulatory norms with an examination of the motivations and behaviour of political parties, individual MPs and the government. These are linked because internal party divisions, cross-party alliances and the differing preferences of MPs on Brexit will affect how - and how well - Parliament scrutinises the process of leaving the EU. The purpose of this project is: (1) To enhance understanding of how the Brexit vote has affected UK party politics, including divisions within and between parties, the positions and preferences of MPs, party positions in Parliament and party competition on EU issues. We will collect and analyse data on the positions on the EU issue adopted by parties and MPs since 2010, assessing how divisions within parties are changing and whether new patterns of cross-party cooperation are emerging. (2) To develop knowledge of how Parliament has responded to Brexit in terms of its structures and procedures, and how effective this response has been. We will examine the work of the new Exiting the EU select committee, the European Scrutiny Committee and other departmental select committees, collecting data on and assessing divisions and cooperation within and across these bodies. (3) To identify those areas of policy that have been most subject to conflict between and within parties and are most likely to change once the UK has left the EU. After Brexit, the UK Parliament will exercise regulatory control over a range of policy areas (e.g. environmental protection, farming, employment rights) which have hitherto been legislated for at the EU level. Parliament will make choices about how, and under what principles it wishes to legislate. We assess the extent to which MPs seek to formulate UK versions of existing EU legislation or continue to broadly adopt EU norms and standards. Our research on whether MPs behave according to traditional party affiliations, or new cross-party alliances and intra-party disputes emerge will also help to explain what factors shape the post-Brexit legislative agenda. (4) To address the needs of key stakeholders by working with our impact partner the Industry and Parliament Trust (IPT) to: (a) better understand the interests and concerns of business and industry stakeholders regarding the Brexit process and the changes that Brexit is likely to bring to their activities; (b) foster effective dialogue between business and industry stakeholders and MPs, notably through a series of seminars and workshops; and (c) provide business and industry stakeholders with clear guidance and analysis of the role and activity of Parliament and MPs in the Brexit process. (5) To maximise user engagement and public understanding by working with the Director of the ERSC UK in a Changing Europe Programme and other projects within it to: (a) synthesise and develop research on parties, Parliament and the transfer of competences; (b) disseminate our research findings to a range of stakeholders and the general public in an easily-accessible form through a variety of forums; and (c) lay the foundations for future research on the impact of Brexit.
4 schema:endDate 2019-03-31
5 schema:funder grid-institutes:grid.434257.3
6 schema:identifier N2d6ef6505bc24bc28713e0204630459f
7 N5552555303db41c899077047134d8f13
8 schema:inLanguage en
9 schema:keywords Brexit
10 Brexit process
11 Brexit vote
12 British political parties
13 Committee
14 EU
15 EU issues
16 EU legislation
17 EU level
18 EU norms
19 Europe programme
20 MP
21 MPs behave
22 Parliament
23 Select Committee
24 UK
25 UK Parliament
26 UK version
27 accessible form
28 activity
29 activity of parliaments
30 affiliation
31 agenda
32 alliance
33 analyse data
34 analysis
35 area
36 areas of policy
37 behave
38 behavior
39 body
40 business
41 business community
42 changes
43 choice
44 clear guidance
45 community
46 competence
47 competition
48 concern
49 concerns of business
50 conflict
51 control
52 cooperation
53 critical areas
54 cross-party alliances
55 data
56 departmental select committees
57 dialogue
58 directors
59 disputes
60 division
61 effect
62 effective dialogue
63 engagement
64 examination
65 exiting
66 experts
67 extent
68 factors
69 field
70 field of law
71 findings
72 form
73 forum
74 foundation
75 future research
76 general public
77 government
78 guidance
79 hitherto
80 impact
81 impact of Brexit
82 importance
83 importance of institutions
84 individual MPs
85 industry
86 industry stakeholders
87 institutions
88 interest
89 internal party divisions
90 issues
91 key stakeholders
92 knowledge
93 law
94 legislation
95 legislative agenda
96 levels
97 motivation
98 need
99 new patterns
100 norms
101 parties
102 partners
103 party affiliation
104 party competition
105 party divisions
106 party politics
107 party positions
108 patterns
109 policy
110 policy areas
111 policymakers
112 political parties
113 political science
114 politics
115 position
116 preferences
117 principles
118 procedure
119 process
120 program
121 project
122 public
123 public understanding
124 purpose
125 range
126 range of stakeholders
127 referendum vote
128 regulatory control
129 regulatory norms
130 research
131 research findings
132 response
133 role
134 science
135 scrutiny committees
136 seminars
137 series
138 series of seminars
139 significant effect
140 stakeholders
141 standards
142 strategies
143 structure
144 synthesise
145 terms
146 transfer
147 transfer of competences
148 trust
149 understanding
150 user engagement
151 variety
152 variety of forums
153 version
154 vote
155 work
156 workshop
157 schema:name Parties, Parliament and the Brexit Process
158 schema:recipient N037eab78d4da4979b66cadcfeda84379
159 Nc9b3a4fbd8f846d2ae5c653c44c2e692
160 Nf3047c9917ac4f6e847394a9335f20e8
161 sg:person.010546376331.14
162 sg:person.011351610457.59
163 sg:person.012147171057.32
164 grid-institutes:grid.500276.6
165 grid-institutes:grid.9918.9
166 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/grant/grant.6620120
167 schema:sdDatePublished 2021-11-01T19:07
168 schema:sdLicense https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/
169 schema:sdPublisher N1705ef461a0b465e9286ce2cb37accf1
170 schema:startDate 2017-03-31
171 schema:url https://gtr.ukri.org/project/28EDE392-51C8-4461-A5AC-39B7C6C32F9C
172 sgo:license sg:explorer/license/
173 sgo:sdDataset grants
174 rdf:type schema:MonetaryGrant
175 N037eab78d4da4979b66cadcfeda84379 schema:member sg:person.010546376331.14
176 schema:roleName PI
177 rdf:type schema:Role
178 N1705ef461a0b465e9286ce2cb37accf1 schema:name Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project
179 rdf:type schema:Organization
180 N2d6ef6505bc24bc28713e0204630459f schema:name dimensions_id
181 schema:value grant.6620120
182 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
183 N308a706a05944cd68111b2cf6ece730d schema:currency GBP
184 schema:value 241040.0
185 rdf:type schema:MonetaryAmount
186 N5552555303db41c899077047134d8f13 schema:name gtr_id
187 schema:value 28EDE392-51C8-4461-A5AC-39B7C6C32F9C
188 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
189 Nc9b3a4fbd8f846d2ae5c653c44c2e692 schema:member sg:person.012147171057.32
190 schema:roleName Co-PI
191 rdf:type schema:Role
192 Nf3047c9917ac4f6e847394a9335f20e8 schema:member sg:person.011351610457.59
193 schema:roleName Co-PI
194 rdf:type schema:Role
195 anzsrc-for:16 schema:inDefinedTermSet anzsrc-for:
196 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
197 sg:person.010546376331.14 schema:affiliation grid-institutes:None
198 schema:familyName Cygan
199 schema:givenName Adam
200 rdf:type schema:Person
201 sg:person.011351610457.59 schema:affiliation grid-institutes:None
202 schema:familyName Lynch
203 schema:givenName Philip
204 rdf:type schema:Person
205 sg:person.012147171057.32 schema:affiliation grid-institutes:None
206 schema:familyName Whitaker
207 schema:givenName Richard
208 rdf:type schema:Person
209 grid-institutes:None schema:name University of Leicester
210 rdf:type schema:Organization
211 grid-institutes:grid.434257.3 schema:Organization
212 grid-institutes:grid.500276.6 schema:Organization
213 grid-institutes:grid.9918.9 schema:Organization
 




Preview window. Press ESC to close (or click here)


...