Parties, Parliament and the Brexit Process View Homepage


Ontology type: schema:MonetaryGrant     


Grant Info

YEARS

2017-2019

FUNDING AMOUNT

241040.0 GBP

ABSTRACT

The 2016 referendum vote for Brexit is already having a significant effect on British political parties and the UK Parliament. It is reshaping the divisions within and between political parties, impacting upon the strategies adopted by parties and individual MPs, and requiring Parliament to adapt its structures and procedures as the Brexit process becomes a critical area of its activity. The proposed project brings together experts drawn from the fields of law and political science, who will work with the Industry and Parliament Trust to inform their research and ensure dialogue with policymakers and the business community. The project combines analysis of the importance of institutions (e.g. parliamentary procedures and structures), and legislative and regulatory norms with an examination of the motivations and behaviour of political parties, individual MPs and the government. These are linked because internal party divisions, cross-party alliances and the differing preferences of MPs on Brexit will affect how - and how well - Parliament scrutinises the process of leaving the EU. The purpose of this project is: (1) To enhance understanding of how the Brexit vote has affected UK party politics, including divisions within and between parties, the positions and preferences of MPs, party positions in Parliament and party competition on EU issues. We will collect and analyse data on the positions on the EU issue adopted by parties and MPs since 2010, assessing how divisions within parties are changing and whether new patterns of cross-party cooperation are emerging. (2) To develop knowledge of how Parliament has responded to Brexit in terms of its structures and procedures, and how effective this response has been. We will examine the work of the new Exiting the EU select committee, the European Scrutiny Committee and other departmental select committees, collecting data on and assessing divisions and cooperation within and across these bodies. (3) To identify those areas of policy that have been most subject to conflict between and within parties and are most likely to change once the UK has left the EU. After Brexit, the UK Parliament will exercise regulatory control over a range of policy areas (e.g. environmental protection, farming, employment rights) which have hitherto been legislated for at the EU level. Parliament will make choices about how, and under what principles it wishes to legislate. We assess the extent to which MPs seek to formulate UK versions of existing EU legislation or continue to broadly adopt EU norms and standards. Our research on whether MPs behave according to traditional party affiliations, or new cross-party alliances and intra-party disputes emerge will also help to explain what factors shape the post-Brexit legislative agenda. (4) To address the needs of key stakeholders by working with our impact partner the Industry and Parliament Trust (IPT) to: (a) better understand the interests and concerns of business and industry stakeholders regarding the Brexit process and the changes that Brexit is likely to bring to their activities; (b) foster effective dialogue between business and industry stakeholders and MPs, notably through a series of seminars and workshops; and (c) provide business and industry stakeholders with clear guidance and analysis of the role and activity of Parliament and MPs in the Brexit process. (5) To maximise user engagement and public understanding by working with the Director of the ERSC UK in a Changing Europe Programme and other projects within it to: (a) synthesise and develop research on parties, Parliament and the transfer of competences; (b) disseminate our research findings to a range of stakeholders and the general public in an easily-accessible form through a variety of forums; and (c) lay the foundations for future research on the impact of Brexit. More... »

URL

https://gtr.ukri.org/project/28EDE392-51C8-4461-A5AC-39B7C6C32F9C

JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.

TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT

[
  {
    "@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json", 
    "about": [
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/44", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/48", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }
    ], 
    "amount": {
      "currency": "GBP", 
      "type": "MonetaryAmount", 
      "value": 241040.0
    }, 
    "description": "The 2016 referendum vote for Brexit is already having a significant effect on British political parties and the UK Parliament. It is reshaping the divisions within and between political parties, impacting upon the strategies adopted by parties and individual MPs, and requiring Parliament to adapt its structures and procedures as the Brexit process becomes a critical area of its activity. The proposed project brings together experts drawn from the fields of law and political science, who will work with the Industry and Parliament Trust to inform their research and ensure dialogue with policymakers and the business community.\nThe project combines analysis of the importance of institutions (e.g. parliamentary procedures and structures), and legislative and regulatory norms with an examination of the motivations and behaviour of political parties, individual MPs and the government. These are linked because internal party divisions, cross-party alliances and the differing preferences of MPs on Brexit will affect how - and how well - Parliament scrutinises the process of leaving the EU. \nThe purpose of this project is:\n(1) To enhance understanding of how the Brexit vote has affected UK party politics, including divisions within and between parties, the positions and preferences of MPs, party positions in Parliament and party competition on EU issues. We will collect and analyse data on the positions on the EU issue adopted by parties and MPs since 2010, assessing how divisions within parties are changing and whether new patterns of cross-party cooperation are emerging. \n(2) To develop knowledge of how Parliament has responded to Brexit in terms of its structures and procedures, and how effective this response has been. We will examine the work of the new Exiting the EU select committee, the European Scrutiny Committee and other departmental select committees, collecting data on and assessing divisions and cooperation within and across these bodies. \n(3) To identify those areas of policy that have been most subject to conflict between and within parties and are most likely to change once the UK has left the EU. After Brexit, the UK Parliament will exercise regulatory control over a range of policy areas (e.g. environmental protection, farming, employment rights) which have hitherto been legislated for at the EU level. Parliament will make choices about how, and under what principles it wishes to legislate. We assess the extent to which MPs seek to formulate UK versions of existing EU legislation or continue to broadly adopt EU norms and standards. Our research on whether MPs behave according to traditional party affiliations, or new cross-party alliances and intra-party disputes emerge will also help to explain what factors shape the post-Brexit legislative agenda. \n(4) To address the needs of key stakeholders by working with our impact partner the Industry and Parliament Trust (IPT) to: (a) better understand the interests and concerns of business and industry stakeholders regarding the Brexit process and the changes that Brexit is likely to bring to their activities; (b) foster effective dialogue between business and industry stakeholders and MPs, notably through a series of seminars and workshops; and (c) provide business and industry stakeholders with clear guidance and analysis of the role and activity of Parliament and MPs in the Brexit process.\n(5) To maximise user engagement and public understanding by working with the Director of the ERSC UK in a Changing Europe Programme and other projects within it to: (a) synthesise and develop research on parties, Parliament and the transfer of competences; (b) disseminate our research findings to a range of stakeholders and the general public in an easily-accessible form through a variety of forums; and (c) lay the foundations for future research on the impact of Brexit.", 
    "endDate": "2019-03-31", 
    "funder": {
      "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.434257.3", 
      "type": "Organization"
    }, 
    "id": "sg:grant.6620120", 
    "identifier": [
      {
        "name": "dimensions_id", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "grant.6620120"
        ]
      }, 
      {
        "name": "gtr_id", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "28EDE392-51C8-4461-A5AC-39B7C6C32F9C"
        ]
      }
    ], 
    "keywords": [
      "cross-party alliances", 
      "Brexit process", 
      "political parties", 
      "EU issues", 
      "individual MPs", 
      "UK Parliament", 
      "industry stakeholders", 
      "internal party divisions", 
      "British political parties", 
      "Select Committee", 
      "areas of policy", 
      "activity of parliaments", 
      "importance of institutions", 
      "transfer of competences", 
      "impact of Brexit", 
      "variety of forums", 
      "range of stakeholders", 
      "party politics", 
      "party competition", 
      "policy areas", 
      "party positions", 
      "political science", 
      "party divisions", 
      "scrutiny committees", 
      "legislative agenda", 
      "party affiliation", 
      "EU norms", 
      "departmental select committees", 
      "referendum vote", 
      "Brexit vote", 
      "EU level", 
      "Brexit", 
      "Parliament", 
      "regulatory norms", 
      "concerns of business", 
      "field of law", 
      "parties", 
      "business community", 
      "effective dialogue", 
      "key stakeholders", 
      "public understanding", 
      "series of seminars", 
      "Europe programme", 
      "new patterns", 
      "EU legislation", 
      "stakeholders", 
      "vote", 
      "research findings", 
      "analyse data", 
      "alliance", 
      "EU", 
      "dialogue", 
      "business", 
      "general public", 
      "norms", 
      "cooperation", 
      "trust", 
      "future research", 
      "project", 
      "UK", 
      "MP", 
      "politics", 
      "Committee", 
      "accessible form", 
      "agenda", 
      "division", 
      "government", 
      "issues", 
      "research", 
      "policy", 
      "clear guidance", 
      "policymakers", 
      "user engagement", 
      "conflict", 
      "legislation", 
      "institutions", 
      "disputes", 
      "UK version", 
      "forum", 
      "engagement", 
      "public", 
      "critical areas", 
      "community", 
      "affiliation", 
      "understanding", 
      "regulatory control", 
      "preferences", 
      "industry", 
      "partners", 
      "position", 
      "law", 
      "seminars", 
      "science", 
      "concern", 
      "competence", 
      "motivation", 
      "need", 
      "foundation", 
      "process", 
      "experts", 
      "workshop", 
      "interest", 
      "competition", 
      "directors", 
      "area", 
      "program", 
      "impact", 
      "hitherto", 
      "synthesise", 
      "extent", 
      "exiting", 
      "knowledge", 
      "findings", 
      "strategies", 
      "importance", 
      "choice", 
      "principles", 
      "form", 
      "purpose", 
      "body", 
      "role", 
      "standards", 
      "analysis", 
      "work", 
      "terms", 
      "guidance", 
      "changes", 
      "data", 
      "activity", 
      "factors", 
      "patterns", 
      "field", 
      "levels", 
      "variety", 
      "behavior", 
      "structure", 
      "examination", 
      "response", 
      "version", 
      "range", 
      "significant effect", 
      "transfer", 
      "series", 
      "behave", 
      "control", 
      "procedure", 
      "effect"
    ], 
    "name": "Parties, Parliament and the Brexit Process", 
    "recipient": [
      {
        "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.9918.9", 
        "type": "Organization"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.500276.6", 
        "type": "Organization"
      }, 
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/None", 
          "name": "University of Leicester", 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Cygan", 
        "givenName": "Adam", 
        "id": "sg:person.010546376331.14", 
        "type": "Person"
      }, 
      {
        "member": "sg:person.010546376331.14", 
        "roleName": "PI", 
        "type": "Role"
      }, 
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/None", 
          "name": "University of Leicester", 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Lynch", 
        "givenName": "Philip", 
        "id": "sg:person.011351610457.59", 
        "type": "Person"
      }, 
      {
        "member": "sg:person.011351610457.59", 
        "roleName": "Co-PI", 
        "type": "Role"
      }, 
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/None", 
          "name": "University of Leicester", 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Whitaker", 
        "givenName": "Richard", 
        "id": "sg:person.012147171057.32", 
        "type": "Person"
      }, 
      {
        "member": "sg:person.012147171057.32", 
        "roleName": "Co-PI", 
        "type": "Role"
      }
    ], 
    "sameAs": [
      "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/grant/grant.6620120"
    ], 
    "sdDataset": "grants", 
    "sdDatePublished": "2022-11-24T21:22", 
    "sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/", 
    "sdPublisher": {
      "name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project", 
      "type": "Organization"
    }, 
    "sdSource": "s3://com-springernature-scigraph/baseset/20221124/entities/gbq_results/grant/grant_71.jsonl", 
    "startDate": "2017-03-31", 
    "type": "MonetaryGrant", 
    "url": "https://gtr.ukri.org/project/28EDE392-51C8-4461-A5AC-39B7C6C32F9C"
  }
]
 

Download the RDF metadata as:  json-ld nt turtle xml License info

HOW TO GET THIS DATA PROGRAMMATICALLY:

JSON-LD is a popular format for linked data which is fully compatible with JSON.

curl -H 'Accept: application/ld+json' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/grant.6620120'

N-Triples is a line-based linked data format ideal for batch operations.

curl -H 'Accept: application/n-triples' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/grant.6620120'

Turtle is a human-readable linked data format.

curl -H 'Accept: text/turtle' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/grant.6620120'

RDF/XML is a standard XML format for linked data.

curl -H 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/grant.6620120'


 

This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.

214 TRIPLES      18 PREDICATES      174 URIs      162 LITERALS      7 BLANK NODES

Subject Predicate Object
1 sg:grant.6620120 schema:about anzsrc-for:44
2 anzsrc-for:48
3 schema:amount N23b9efe6c19e4a68b3949bb480121a46
4 schema:description The 2016 referendum vote for Brexit is already having a significant effect on British political parties and the UK Parliament. It is reshaping the divisions within and between political parties, impacting upon the strategies adopted by parties and individual MPs, and requiring Parliament to adapt its structures and procedures as the Brexit process becomes a critical area of its activity. The proposed project brings together experts drawn from the fields of law and political science, who will work with the Industry and Parliament Trust to inform their research and ensure dialogue with policymakers and the business community. The project combines analysis of the importance of institutions (e.g. parliamentary procedures and structures), and legislative and regulatory norms with an examination of the motivations and behaviour of political parties, individual MPs and the government. These are linked because internal party divisions, cross-party alliances and the differing preferences of MPs on Brexit will affect how - and how well - Parliament scrutinises the process of leaving the EU. The purpose of this project is: (1) To enhance understanding of how the Brexit vote has affected UK party politics, including divisions within and between parties, the positions and preferences of MPs, party positions in Parliament and party competition on EU issues. We will collect and analyse data on the positions on the EU issue adopted by parties and MPs since 2010, assessing how divisions within parties are changing and whether new patterns of cross-party cooperation are emerging. (2) To develop knowledge of how Parliament has responded to Brexit in terms of its structures and procedures, and how effective this response has been. We will examine the work of the new Exiting the EU select committee, the European Scrutiny Committee and other departmental select committees, collecting data on and assessing divisions and cooperation within and across these bodies. (3) To identify those areas of policy that have been most subject to conflict between and within parties and are most likely to change once the UK has left the EU. After Brexit, the UK Parliament will exercise regulatory control over a range of policy areas (e.g. environmental protection, farming, employment rights) which have hitherto been legislated for at the EU level. Parliament will make choices about how, and under what principles it wishes to legislate. We assess the extent to which MPs seek to formulate UK versions of existing EU legislation or continue to broadly adopt EU norms and standards. Our research on whether MPs behave according to traditional party affiliations, or new cross-party alliances and intra-party disputes emerge will also help to explain what factors shape the post-Brexit legislative agenda. (4) To address the needs of key stakeholders by working with our impact partner the Industry and Parliament Trust (IPT) to: (a) better understand the interests and concerns of business and industry stakeholders regarding the Brexit process and the changes that Brexit is likely to bring to their activities; (b) foster effective dialogue between business and industry stakeholders and MPs, notably through a series of seminars and workshops; and (c) provide business and industry stakeholders with clear guidance and analysis of the role and activity of Parliament and MPs in the Brexit process. (5) To maximise user engagement and public understanding by working with the Director of the ERSC UK in a Changing Europe Programme and other projects within it to: (a) synthesise and develop research on parties, Parliament and the transfer of competences; (b) disseminate our research findings to a range of stakeholders and the general public in an easily-accessible form through a variety of forums; and (c) lay the foundations for future research on the impact of Brexit.
5 schema:endDate 2019-03-31
6 schema:funder grid-institutes:grid.434257.3
7 schema:identifier N5363c7d41de44f189ed3cdbcd157cb90
8 Nb8e7f3f4b48648bd90ff0711fb6bf6e2
9 schema:keywords Brexit
10 Brexit process
11 Brexit vote
12 British political parties
13 Committee
14 EU
15 EU issues
16 EU legislation
17 EU level
18 EU norms
19 Europe programme
20 MP
21 Parliament
22 Select Committee
23 UK
24 UK Parliament
25 UK version
26 accessible form
27 activity
28 activity of parliaments
29 affiliation
30 agenda
31 alliance
32 analyse data
33 analysis
34 area
35 areas of policy
36 behave
37 behavior
38 body
39 business
40 business community
41 changes
42 choice
43 clear guidance
44 community
45 competence
46 competition
47 concern
48 concerns of business
49 conflict
50 control
51 cooperation
52 critical areas
53 cross-party alliances
54 data
55 departmental select committees
56 dialogue
57 directors
58 disputes
59 division
60 effect
61 effective dialogue
62 engagement
63 examination
64 exiting
65 experts
66 extent
67 factors
68 field
69 field of law
70 findings
71 form
72 forum
73 foundation
74 future research
75 general public
76 government
77 guidance
78 hitherto
79 impact
80 impact of Brexit
81 importance
82 importance of institutions
83 individual MPs
84 industry
85 industry stakeholders
86 institutions
87 interest
88 internal party divisions
89 issues
90 key stakeholders
91 knowledge
92 law
93 legislation
94 legislative agenda
95 levels
96 motivation
97 need
98 new patterns
99 norms
100 parties
101 partners
102 party affiliation
103 party competition
104 party divisions
105 party politics
106 party positions
107 patterns
108 policy
109 policy areas
110 policymakers
111 political parties
112 political science
113 politics
114 position
115 preferences
116 principles
117 procedure
118 process
119 program
120 project
121 public
122 public understanding
123 purpose
124 range
125 range of stakeholders
126 referendum vote
127 regulatory control
128 regulatory norms
129 research
130 research findings
131 response
132 role
133 science
134 scrutiny committees
135 seminars
136 series
137 series of seminars
138 significant effect
139 stakeholders
140 standards
141 strategies
142 structure
143 synthesise
144 terms
145 transfer
146 transfer of competences
147 trust
148 understanding
149 user engagement
150 variety
151 variety of forums
152 version
153 vote
154 work
155 workshop
156 schema:name Parties, Parliament and the Brexit Process
157 schema:recipient N3976ed88bedc47f6a8d5cc4594584812
158 N3be269dee29644d090247ac34bed9ba0
159 N49e31bd6cb4642aeb6eae60f3d2389aa
160 sg:person.010546376331.14
161 sg:person.011351610457.59
162 sg:person.012147171057.32
163 grid-institutes:grid.500276.6
164 grid-institutes:grid.9918.9
165 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/grant/grant.6620120
166 schema:sdDatePublished 2022-11-24T21:22
167 schema:sdLicense https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/
168 schema:sdPublisher Nd3f2cb645abd45cd8c569512d09e9155
169 schema:startDate 2017-03-31
170 schema:url https://gtr.ukri.org/project/28EDE392-51C8-4461-A5AC-39B7C6C32F9C
171 sgo:license sg:explorer/license/
172 sgo:sdDataset grants
173 rdf:type schema:MonetaryGrant
174 N23b9efe6c19e4a68b3949bb480121a46 schema:currency GBP
175 schema:value 241040.0
176 rdf:type schema:MonetaryAmount
177 N3976ed88bedc47f6a8d5cc4594584812 schema:member sg:person.011351610457.59
178 schema:roleName Co-PI
179 rdf:type schema:Role
180 N3be269dee29644d090247ac34bed9ba0 schema:member sg:person.010546376331.14
181 schema:roleName PI
182 rdf:type schema:Role
183 N49e31bd6cb4642aeb6eae60f3d2389aa schema:member sg:person.012147171057.32
184 schema:roleName Co-PI
185 rdf:type schema:Role
186 N5363c7d41de44f189ed3cdbcd157cb90 schema:name gtr_id
187 schema:value 28EDE392-51C8-4461-A5AC-39B7C6C32F9C
188 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
189 Nb8e7f3f4b48648bd90ff0711fb6bf6e2 schema:name dimensions_id
190 schema:value grant.6620120
191 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
192 Nd3f2cb645abd45cd8c569512d09e9155 schema:name Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project
193 rdf:type schema:Organization
194 anzsrc-for:44 schema:inDefinedTermSet anzsrc-for:
195 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
196 anzsrc-for:48 schema:inDefinedTermSet anzsrc-for:
197 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
198 sg:person.010546376331.14 schema:affiliation grid-institutes:None
199 schema:familyName Cygan
200 schema:givenName Adam
201 rdf:type schema:Person
202 sg:person.011351610457.59 schema:affiliation grid-institutes:None
203 schema:familyName Lynch
204 schema:givenName Philip
205 rdf:type schema:Person
206 sg:person.012147171057.32 schema:affiliation grid-institutes:None
207 schema:familyName Whitaker
208 schema:givenName Richard
209 rdf:type schema:Person
210 grid-institutes:None schema:name University of Leicester
211 rdf:type schema:Organization
212 grid-institutes:grid.434257.3 schema:Organization
213 grid-institutes:grid.500276.6 schema:Organization
214 grid-institutes:grid.9918.9 schema:Organization
 




Preview window. Press ESC to close (or click here)


...